Finding F(q) for a Uniform Spherical Charge Model of the Proton

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Here is the problem:

Use the fact that the form factor, F(q), is the Fourier transform of the normalised charge
distribution \rho(r), which in the spherically symmetric case gives

F(q) = \int \frac{4\pi \hbar r}{q}\rho(r) sin(qr/\hbar))dr

to find an expression for F(q) for a simple model of the proton considered as a uniform
spherical charge distribution of radius R.

Using your calculated expression for F(q), demonstrate that in the limit
\frac{qR}{\hbar} << 1
the form factor reduces to 1.

So, what I have tried so far:

I said that for 0 < r < R, the charge density is constant, and could be taken outside the integral along with the other constants, leaving me with

F(q) = \frac{4\pi \hbar \rho}{q}\int^R_0 r.sin(qr/\hbar)dr

which when I integrate by parts leads to

F(q) = \frac{4\pi \hbar^3 \rho}{q^3}sin(qR/\hbar) - \frac{4\pi \hbar^2 \rho R}{q^2}cos(qR/\hbar)

I am certain that I have done the integration correctly.

Then I come to the part where I make the approximation that \frac{qR}{\hbar} &lt;&lt; 1 and this happens:
sin(qR/\hbar) \approx qR/\hbar

and

cos(qR/\hbar) \approx 1

which gives me

F(q) = \frac{4\pi \hbar^2 \rho R}{q^2} - \frac{4\pi \hbar^2 \rho R}{q^2} = 0

but I am supposed to be getting F(q) = 1 when I make this approximation.

What am I doing wrong here? My only thought was that the question mentions something about normalization, and I thought that may have something to do with something, but I couln't think what. Any suggestions?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used a charge density of e/volume (3 e /4 pi R^3) integrated over all space in spherical polars & normalised it then put it in the equation. It basically just got rid of the e

But i still get 0 for the 2nd bit!
edit: Hooray, i get 1 using 2nd order approximations for sin & cos
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top