Finding Final Temp. Distribution After Thermal Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the final temperature distribution after thermal equilibrium in an isolated system. It emphasizes that while thermal energy is conserved, temperature is not, leading to confusion about the correct approach. The initial energy calculations for two materials are presented, but the method used is acknowledged as incorrect. The correct understanding involves recognizing that the total internal energy remains constant and that the system will reach a uniform temperature at maximum entropy. The final equilibrium temperature can be determined by equating the initial and final energy states.
niazaliahmed
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
QscNm.png


The above diagram shows the problem description.

I have to find the final temperature distribution after thermal equilibrium.

I am assuming that the thermal energy is conserved but not the temperature.(Correct me if I am wrong)

Energy of the materials at initial state is (Refer Image)

For material 1 - m.Cp.T = 100*1*45 W = 4500W
For material 2 - m.Cp.T = 200*1*50 W = 10000W

So the system would achieve equilibrium when the energy in both material are same i.e. 7250W

If that happens Material 1 would be at a temperature of 72.5 C
Material 2 would be at a temperature of 36.25 C

I know that this method is wrong indeed. But can anyone explain me why we would conserve the temperature instead of energy of the system??
 
Science news on Phys.org
For starters the correct unit of energy is Joules(J) not Watts(W). The correct unit of temperature is Kelvin(K) not Celsius(C). If I remember correctly you add 273 to a temperature in C to get it into K.

Since the system (meaning both blocks) is isolated, the the total internal energy must remain constant. An isolated system will eventually reach a state of maximum entropy (and therefore uniform temperature).

So the initial energy in the system is:

m1c1T1 + m1c1T2 = a constant

and after reaching equilibrium

(m1c1+m2c2)T = the same constant

thus equate the two and solve for T.
 
That was helpful, thanks
 
Been around 40 years since I took basic physics in college and while I remember doing some examples of insulation values / energy conduction, I doubt I could to the math now even if I could find the formulas. I have some some corrugated plastic sheet (think of the plastic signs you see on the side of the road) that is used in bee hives. Also have some used in a green house though a bit different in dimensions than this example but the general approach should still apply. Typically, both...
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...
Back
Top