Finding Focus Length in Broken Double Convex Lens

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the focal lengths of a broken double convex lens when its two halves are combined. One participant suggests that the focal length of the first arrangement is infinite, as incident rays do not converge. For the second arrangement, there is confusion regarding whether the focal length is 2f or f/2, with the consensus leaning towards f/2 as the correct answer. The relationship between lens power and focal length is highlighted, indicating that a more converging combination results in a shorter focal length. Ultimately, the participants reach an understanding of the correct focal lengths based on their analysis.
Prashasti
Messages
63
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A thin double convex lens of focal length f is broken down into two halves at the axis. The two haves are then combined, as shown in the figure. What will be the focal length for the arrangements?

http://www.meritnation.com/app/webroot/img/shared/content_ck_images/images/Untitled(375).png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For (i), I think that the answer is infinite because any incident ray will either go undeviated or will be laterally displaced - but the combination will not be able to converge it.
upload_2015-2-10_17-57-20.png

Is it right?

And, about the second arrangement - I think it must be 2f, but in my book, f/2 has been given as the answer!
upload_2015-2-10_18-2-55.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answers look good to me. I think you even realize that f/2 is the correct answer, based upon your drawing...

The combined lens will be more focusing -- i.e. shorter focal length. 2f is a focal length 2X as long. Can that possibly be right, given your picture?
 
  • Like
Likes Prashasti
Ahh! I got it!
Power is inversely related to focal length. Now, because the combination is "more" converging (more power), its focal length will be less. :headbang:
I think it's correct now.
Thanks!
:oldsmile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Back
Top