Finding force from electric potential energy using gradients.

mattyc33
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a certain region, a charge distribution exists that is spherically symmetric but
non-uniform. When a positive point charge q is located at (r,θ,φ) near this charge
distribution, there is a resulting electric potential energy for the system given by:

U(r,θ,φ) = ρ(naught)a^2q/18ε(naught)(1-3((r/a)^2) + 2((r/a)^3) for r ≤ a

and 0 for r ≥ a

where ρo is a constant having units of C/m^3 (volume charge density) and a is a
constant having units of m. Note that there is no θ or φ dependence here since the
charge distribution is spherically symmetric.
Determine the electric force F
exerted on charge q as a function of its location
(r,θ,φ) for:
a) r ≤ a
b) r > a
Check that the units of your answer make sense. (Show your work.)

Homework Equations



F=-∇U
∇U=dU/dr r

The Attempt at a Solution

'

I derived ∇U=dU/dr r from the spherical coordinate gradients and since there is no dependence on phi and theta we will just be using the r vector.

therefore:

d/drρ(naught)a^2q/18ε(naught)(1-3((r/a)^2) + 2((r/a)^3) r

= 6r(r-a)/a^3 r

This is where I don't know what to do, how would I express my answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated grad(U) ... you have the relationship between F and grad(U) ... you are asked for F... what's the problem?

Maybe this will help: You have told us...

$$U(r,\theta,\varphi) = U(r) = \frac{\rho_{0}a^2q}{18\epsilon_0 (1-3\left (\frac{r}{a}\right )^2)} + 2\left (\frac{r}{a}\right )^3 \; : \; r \leq a$$ $$\vec{F} = -\nabla U(r,\theta,\varphi)=-\frac{d}{dr}U(r)\hat{r}$$ $$\frac{d}{dr}U(r)=\frac{6r(r-a)}{a^3}$$... note: I'd check that derivative: I don't see where ##\rho_0##, ##q## and ##\epsilon_0## went for eg.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for clearing things up.

At this point I'm just having trouble proving that my answer will be in Newtons (correct units). Which means I probably derived wrong.
 
In fact, [a]=L so your answer has dimensions of inverse-length.
You should go over the derivation.

Is the expression for U(r) (above) the same as what you are given?
The second term 2((r/a)^3) is dimensionless ... what dimensions should U have?
 
Sorry I must have mistyped the equation in the first place.

It should have been:

(ρ(naught)a^2q/18ε(naught)) (1-3((r/a)^2) + 2((r/a)^3)

Hopefully that makes it more clear.

The units for U should be Joules I believe (could be mistaken)
 
(ρ(naught)a^2q/18ε(naught)) (1-3((r/a)^2) + 2((r/a)^3)
Here, let me help with that... $$U(r)= \frac{\rho_0 a^2 q}{18\epsilon_0} \left ( 1-3\left( \frac{r}{a} \right )^2 +2\left ( \frac{r}{a} \right )^3 \right )$$... LaTeX is totally worth the effort of learning it.

To proceed, I would either change the variable, say z=r/a so $$\frac{dU}{dr}=\frac{1}{a}\frac{dU}{dz}$$... or just rearrange $$U(r)= \frac{\rho_0 q}{18\epsilon_0 a} \left ( a^3 -3ar^2+2r^3 \right )$$... you should be able to see right away that you don't have enough constants in your answer... probably you just forgot to put them back at the end.

BTW: "dimensions" is different from "units" ... electric potential has units of "Volts" (energy per unit charge) ... charge is dimensionless so U has dimensions of energy - which would be M.L2T-2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top