Finding free electron gas Green function in Fourier space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Green function for a free electron gas in Fourier space, referencing Fetter's 1971 work. The user expresses confusion about the exponential terms in the Green function, particularly the sign in the time-dependent exponential and how to handle the field operator's sandwiching. There is mention of the step function's role in the two-time region and its relation to the filled Fermi sea. The user seeks clarification on these points, emphasizing the importance of understanding the ground state at zero temperature. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in this quantum mechanics topic.
kakaho345
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
See below
Relevant Equations
See below
As in title:
1681350014004.png


Plugging in the definition is straight forward, I am too lazy to type, I will just quote the book Fetter 1971:
1681350111348.png

1681350169049.png

1681350186563.png

1681350198430.png

Up to here everything is very straight forward, in particular, since we are working on free electron gas, ##E=\hbar \omega##

However, I have no idea how to arrive here:
1681350443696.png

I understand that ##e^{ik\cdot(x-x')}## is from terms like ##\psi=e^{ikx}c##, however, the term ##e^{-i\omega_k(t-t')}## the sign doesn't look right to me for the two time region should have different signs in the exponential. Also, I don't know how to deal with the exponential sandwiched between the field operator. The step function in time is from the two pieces of time regions, but I am not sure on the step function in k. I may be from the filled Fermi sea.

I understand this is a very simple question. However, I have been sitting whole day dealing with this. Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply have to think about, how the ground state looks like! Note that at ##T=0## the system is in a pure state of lowest possible energy under the given constraints. First think what is the constraint here!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top