Finding free electron gas Green function in Fourier space

kakaho345
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
See below
Relevant Equations
See below
As in title:
1681350014004.png


Plugging in the definition is straight forward, I am too lazy to type, I will just quote the book Fetter 1971:
1681350111348.png

1681350169049.png

1681350186563.png

1681350198430.png

Up to here everything is very straight forward, in particular, since we are working on free electron gas, ##E=\hbar \omega##

However, I have no idea how to arrive here:
1681350443696.png

I understand that ##e^{ik\cdot(x-x')}## is from terms like ##\psi=e^{ikx}c##, however, the term ##e^{-i\omega_k(t-t')}## the sign doesn't look right to me for the two time region should have different signs in the exponential. Also, I don't know how to deal with the exponential sandwiched between the field operator. The step function in time is from the two pieces of time regions, but I am not sure on the step function in k. I may be from the filled Fermi sea.

I understand this is a very simple question. However, I have been sitting whole day dealing with this. Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply have to think about, how the ground state looks like! Note that at ##T=0## the system is in a pure state of lowest possible energy under the given constraints. First think what is the constraint here!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top