Finding Highest Energy for Fermions and Bosons in a Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter baubletop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Fermions
AI Thread Summary
To find the highest energy levels for fermions and bosons in a box, the Pauli Exclusion Principle is crucial for fermions like electrons and neutrons, allowing only one particle per quantum state. For 12 fermions (6 electrons and 6 neutrons), the highest energy level corresponds to n=3. In contrast, bosons, such as pi zero bosons and alpha particles, can all occupy the same ground state due to their lack of exclusion principles. Thus, for the bosons, they all reside in the lowest energy state. This distinction highlights the fundamental differences in how fermions and bosons fill energy levels.
baubletop
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a. Electrons and neutrons are fermions. Put 12 of them (6 each) in a box, and determine the n value for the ones with the highest energy.
b. Do the same for 12 bosons (6 are pi zero bosons and 6 are alpha particles).


Homework Equations


En = (h2n2)/(8mL2)


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not even sure how to approach this problem. What is it asking? How do I know which have the highest energy? (Neutrons in general have a higher rest energy than electrons, but I don't know if that's at all relevant.)
My only hunch is that the Pauli Exclusion Principle is involved (like I could have 2 electrons in ground state, 2 in n=2 state, 2 in n=3 state, etc. but that doesn't seem like what the question is asking).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is special about the way Fermions fill energy levels?
 
Two fermions can't occupy the same quantum state. So if there are 6 electrons the highest energy level would be n=3 (same for the neutrons).
 
So you have just answered question (a).
What is the difference with bosons?
 
Bosons aren't subject to the Pauli Exclusion Principle so they can all occupy the ground state.

I wasn't sure if I was over- or under-thinking the problem, it seemed too easy...
 
I know - it throws you out when it's not something subtle or tricky.
But it's good practice.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top