Finding Initial Speed of Second Sled

  • Thread starter Thread starter jubbly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two sleds on a frictionless incline, with one sled starting at the bottom and another released from the top. The first sled has an initial speed of 4.46 m/s and both sleds reach the bottom simultaneously. The key equations involve calculating time and distance using kinematics, specifically the equation x = (1/2) * a * t² + v0 * t. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing the incline and understanding the forces acting on both sleds. A correct approach requires careful application of the kinematic equations to find the initial speed of the second sled.
jubbly
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A frictionless plane is 11.4 m long and inclined
at 39.4◦. A sled starts at the bottom with an
initial speed of 4.46 m/s up the incline. When
it reaches the point at which it momentarily
stops, a second sled is released from the top
of this incline with an initial speed vi. Both
sleds reach the bottom of the incline at the
same moment.The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s

Find the initial speed of the second sled.
Answer in units of m/s


Homework Equations



x = (1/2) * a * t² + v0 * t

The Attempt at a Solution



t = 4.46/6.22
t = .717
So basically all I did was plug and chug...

11.4 = .5 * 9.8 * sin39.4 * .717^2 + v0 * .717

12.998 = v0 * .717
v0 = 18.129

Some reason I'm not getting the correct answer. Anyone want to tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First you should draw a picture of the incline the sleds and the force of gravity affecting the sleds.

From the initial problem statement you know that the time to reach the bottom is the same for both sleds.

And you know that the same gravity force is acting on them.

The other thin you know is that one sled starts falling from some point on the incline which isn't at the top but the second sled is definitely at the top of the incline.

Lastly, you know the second sled has an initial velocity but you don't know what it is.

So draw a picture and think about these relationships and the formulas you have to work with then post your results again.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top