Finding Integer Sided Isosceles Triangles with Perimeter 2008

  • Thread starter Thread starter ritwik06
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding integer-sided isosceles obtuse triangles with a perimeter of 2008. The correct equation derived is 2(L + X) = 2008, leading to L + X = 1004. The analysis involves using the sine rule and cosine rule to establish relationships between the sides and angles, ultimately concluding that the conditions for forming such triangles cannot be met. It is determined that no integer-sided isosceles obtuse triangles with the specified perimeter exist.
ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the number of of all integer sided isosceles obtuse angle triangles with perimeter 2008.

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed the obtuse angle as 90+2a
Let the length of the equal sides be L an that of the base = 2X
2(L+x)=1004

Draw the perpendicular to the side opposite to the obtuse angle from the opposite vertex.
It will divide the triangle into congruent parts. Using sine rule in one of the to triangles formed.
I get
sin (45+a)/X=1/L
sin (45+a)/X=1/(1004-X)


X=1004/ (cosec (45+a)+1)
0<a<45

2<cosec (45+a)+1<2.4142

as 2X is an integer

cosec (45+a)+1 should be an integer and a factor of 1004 which is not possible. Therefore, no such triangle is possible!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ritwik06 said:

Homework Statement


Find the number of of all integer sided isosceles obtuse angle triangles with perimeter 2008.

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed the obtuse angle as 90+2a
Let the length of the equal sides be L an that of the base = 2X
2(L+x)=1004
You're given that the perimeter is 2008, not 1004, so the equation should be
2L + 2X = 2008, or 2(L + X) = 2008, from which you get L + X = 1004
ritwik06 said:
Draw the perpendicular to the side opposite to the obtuse angle from the opposite vertex.
It will divide the triangle into congruent parts. Using sine rule in one of the to triangles formed.
I get
sin (45+a)/X=1/L

It's much simpler as sin(45 + a) = X/L
Replacing L by 1004 - X, this becomes
sin(45 + a) = X/(1004 - X)
ritwik06 said:
sin (45+a)/X=1/(1004-X)


X=1004/ (cosec (45+a)+1)
0<a<45

2<cosec (45+a)+1<2.4142
I don't follow your logic here. It looks like it comes from 1 < csc(45 + a) < sqrt(2), but you'll have to explain why that is true. (It might be, but I don't see it.)

Also, you can't replace 1 + sqrt(2) with 2.4142; they are only approximately equal.
ritwik06 said:
as 2X is an integer

cosec (45+a)+1 should be an integer and a factor of 1004 which is not possible. Therefore, no such triangle is possible!
 
The obtuse angle alpha must indeed be the angle between the equal sides L. Let the side opposite to alpha ideed be 2x. Use of the cosine rule gives
4*x^2=L^2+L^2 -2L^2*cos(alpha).
So cos(alpha)=1-2*x^2/L^2. Because the angle is obtuse cos(alpha)<0 so to solve is:
1-2*x^2/L^2<0, multiply by L^2, since L^2 >0 this gives L^2-2*x^2<0, or L^2<2*x^2,
L<xSqrt(2)=(1004-L)sqrt(2), L(1+sqrt(2))<1004, L<1004/(1+sqrt(2).
The number of solutions are: int(1004/(1+sqrt(2).
greetings
 
Made an error L has to be greater than x!
 
Just so you know, there is another way that I might prefer to get to the point where L^2<2*x^2. If you remember our Pythagorean Theorem for right triangles:
a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2}
You might also know that for obtuse triangles:
a^{2} + b^{2} &lt; c^{2}
Because you chose L for the legs, a and b, and 2x for the largest side, the one opposite alpha or c.
L^{2} + L^{2} &lt; (2x)^{2}
or
2L^{2} &lt; 4x^{2}
therefore
L^{2} &lt; 2x^{2}
I like this way, and showing it two ways means it's probably right.
 
Chaos2009 said:
therefore
L^{2} &lt; 2x^{2}
I like this way, and showing it two ways means it's probably right.

Ok so x<L<sqrt(2)*x, and how many solutions are there?
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top