Finding line where two planes intersect

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Planes
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the line of intersection between two planes using a system of equations in row echelon form (REF). The initial calculations yielded the equations x = 3 + (3/7)z and y = (1/7)z, with z as a free variable. A mistake was identified where x was incorrectly set to zero, which was clarified as an error. The correct form for the line of intersection was established as L = [(3/7)t + 3]i + [(1/7)t]j + tk, providing a geometric interpretation for finding points on the line. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate equation manipulation in vector form.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1682916672512.png

The solution is,
1682916718595.png

However, I could not get that. By getting the system in REF, I got ##x = 3 + \frac{3}{7}z ## and ##y = \frac{1}{7}z##. Therefore z is a free variable so ##x = 3 + \frac{3}{7}t = 0## and ##y = \frac{1}{7}t##.

Thus equation of line is ##x\hat i + y\hat j + z\hat k = 3\hat i + (\frac{3}{7}\hat i + \frac{1}{7}\hat j)t##

Does anybody please know what I did wrong here?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

By getting the system in REF, I got x=3+37z=0 and y=17z.
You are right to get
x=3+\frac{3}{7}z
but why do you make it zero ?
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
anuttarasammyak said:
You are right to get
x=3+\frac{3}{7}z
but why do you make it zero ?
Thank you for your reply @anuttarasammyak !

Sorry my mistake. That was not meant to be set to zero.

Many thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this problem,
View attachment 325740
The solution is,
View attachment 325741
However, I could not get that. By getting the system in REF, I got ##x = 3 + \frac{3}{7}z ## and ##y = \frac{1}{7}z##. Therefore z is a free variable so ##x = 3 + \frac{3}{7}t = 0## and ##y = \frac{1}{7}t##.
I got the same thing but took it one step further, with z = t. So the equation of the line of intersection is ##L = (\frac 3 7 t + 3)\hat i + \frac 1 7 t \hat j + t \hat k##.

In vector form, the above is ##L = \begin{bmatrix} \frac 3 7 \\ \frac 1 7 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}t + \begin{bmatrix} 3 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}##

Geometrically, to get points on this line, go out 3 units on the x-axis, and then go off in the direction of <3t/7, t/7, t>.
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thus equation of line is ##x\hat i + y\hat j + z\hat k = 3\hat i + (\frac{3}{7}\hat i + \frac{1}{7}\hat j)t##
Your equation doesn't follow from your work that preceded it.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...