Finding magnitude of new electric fields

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field at point P due to four fixed charges: q1 = q2 = 3e, q3 = 2e, and q4 = -10e, with a distance d of 5.42 μm. A participant attempted to use the formula E=1/(4πε0) x [ q4/2d^2 - q3/d^2] but arrived at an incorrect result of 1.53 x 10^20. Other participants pointed out the absence of charges q1 and q2 in the calculations and questioned the use of scalar equations for a vector quantity like electric field. They requested the full calculations to identify the error. The conversation highlights the importance of including all relevant charges and using proper vector notation in electric field calculations.
wbetting
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In Fig. 22-31 the four particles are fixed in place and have charges q1 = q2 = 3e, q3 = 2e, and q4 = -10e. Distance d = 5.42 μm. What is the magnitude of the net electric field at point P due to the particles?

Homework Equations


E=1/(4πε0) x [ q4/2d^2-q3/d^2] j

=1/(4πε0) X [(10q/4d)^2- (2q/d^2)



The Attempt at a Solution



my work is above and i got 1.53 x 10^20 which is wrong and i have no idea where i went wrong! i followed the student solution manual!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi wbetting! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 buttons just above the Reply box :wink:)
wbetting said:
In Fig. 22-31 the four particles are fixed in place and have charges q1 = q2 = 3e, q3 = 2e, and q4 = -10e. Distance d = 5.42 μm. What is the magnitude of the net electric field at point P due to the particles?

Homework Equations


E=1/(4πε0) x [ q4/2d^2-q3/d^2] j

=1/(4πε0) X [(10q/4d)^2- (2q/d^2)

is this a square? where is P?

why is there no q1 or q2 in your equations?

and why do your equations look like scalar equations when the electric field is a vector? :confused:

show us your full calculations, and then we'll see what went wrong, and we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top