Finding mass in a confusing problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter MissFortune
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a high jumper who falls into a foam pit, using given values of velocity, distance, and force. The key to solving the problem lies in applying the equations of motion that connect acceleration, velocity, and distance. Participants suggest focusing on the force exerted by the foam pit and the jumper's initial velocity to derive the mass. Additionally, they mention considering gravitational potential energy for a more comprehensive approach. The original poster expresses confusion about the correct calculations and seeks clarification on whether to multiply or divide certain values.
MissFortune
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have tried many times to figure out the formula to solve this problem. I have drawn diagrams & searched through my book numerous times. If I just had the formula to solve it, I would be fine. I don't have a scanner so I can't show you all the diagrams & whatnot but here is the problem.

" high jumper falling a 3.9 m/s, lands on a foam pit and comes to rest, compressing the pit a distance of 0.43 m. If the pit is able to exert an average fource of -1100 N on the high jumper in breaking the fall, what is the jumper's mass? "

Please help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The jumper has a velocity of 3.9 m/s just as they hit the foam, and comes to rest after traveling 0.43 m. So you need to work out the deceleration, or negative acceleration.

You have,

velocity,
distance,
acceleration.

What eqn of motion connects all three ?
 
Another way to look at it is, need m, have disp, veloc, and the force bringing the jumper to a halt. A quick substitution into an equation gives you what you need , but its essentially the same thing, just a different approach.
 
Thanks, Ill try working with that. If I have any more questions, and I am sure I will, Ill be back.
 
If you come back: note that you have a force and a distance. What does that suggest? Once you have that, you have the speed with which the jumper strikes the pit - from that, you should be able to get the mass. Think energy.

Note: Depending on how tricky you want to get, you might also take into account the change in gravitational potential energy of the jumper as she comes to rest. It shouldn't complicate the algebra by much.
 
Ok I am back.
Now I've got it down to two answers but I am not sure if I am supposed to multiply or divide at a certain point.
Is it - 0.43 * 3.9 = 1.677 * 1100 = 1845
or is it - 0.43/3.9m/s = 0.1102 * 1100 = 121

Or am I completely off?
Please help..
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top