Finding mass of glucose in standard solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of glucose in standard sugar solutions for a thin layer chromatography experiment. The provided glucose standard solution concentration is 1 mg/ml, while the other sugar solutions (glucose, fructose, and maltose) are at 10 mg/ml. Participants are tasked with converting these concentrations to micrograms (μg) to determine the amount of glucose in each standard. There is some confusion regarding the wording of the question and whether glucose is present in the other standard solutions. Ultimately, the focus is on accurately determining the glucose content in relation to the provided concentrations.
DespicableMe
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is for an experiment that separates sugars in a sample using TLC.
We are given a glucose standard solution with a concentration of 1mg/ml as well as 3 standard sugar solutions (glucose, fructose and maltose) all with the same concentration (10mg/ml) in 10% v/v isopropanol)

We are asked to find μg of glucose (reducing sugar) in each of the standards.

Homework Equations


I don't think there are any equations, just conversions.

The Attempt at a Solution


Convert the mg/ml to μg/ml or to μg/μl
But I'm not sure if I'm overthinking it or if it's the way the question is worded because it's worth only 1 mark.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard to say anything not knowing how the question is worded. From your description it can be anything and everything.
 
We're given a juice sample and we use thin layer chromatography to identify the sugars in there. They gave us the concentrations of the standard sugar solutions and we were asked to find the μg of glucose (the reducing sugar) in each of the standards. They said to refer to the glucose concentration given to us which was 1 mg/ml. The concentration of the standards were 10 mg/ml though.
 
From what you wrote there is no glucose in the other standard solutions.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top