Finding Pitch Circle & Teeth for Amplitude Movement

AI Thread Summary
To determine the pitch circle and number of teeth for a mechanism to achieve a specific amplitude, the calculations involve the pitch diameter and the number of original pinion teeth. The mechanism's design may require an even number of teeth before any are removed, with the suggestion that removing one more than half of the original teeth is necessary for proper function. The total shift of the rack can be calculated using the pitch diameter multiplied by pi divided by two or the rack tooth pitch times the number of original pinion teeth divided by two. Concerns are raised about the mechanism's violent motion and infinite acceleration at the end of each stroke, despite appearing smooth in animation. Clarification is sought regarding whether the calculated distance is in meters or meters per second, specifically questioning the interpretation of the pitch circle versus the distance the rack moves per revolution.
Jones1987
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
How would I work out the pitch circle and number of teeth required to move the mechanism a certain amplitude? Looked over 4-5 sources for pitch circle, but cannot make sense of it..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
In the animation, if the pinion had all its teeth, there would be 12. 7 of those teeth have been removed (5 remaining). Not absolutely sure, but based on the model, it may only work with an even number of pinion teeth (prior to removal). 1 more than half of the original number of teeth likely have to be removed.
The rack shifts a total (from left to right say, before returning) of:
(pitch diameter) x (pi) / 2
or
(rack tooth pitch) x (number of original pinion teeth) / 2

This mechanism is really not very nice. Although it appears to be simple, its motion is quite violent. At the end of each stroke there is infinite acceleration. In the animation, it looks smooth, but that's only because the rack has no mass.
 
tvavanasd said:
In the animation, if the pinion had all its teeth, there would be 12. 7 of those teeth have been removed (5 remaining). Not absolutely sure, but based on the model, it may only work with an even number of pinion teeth (prior to removal). 1 more than half of the original number of teeth likely have to be removed.
The rack shifts a total (from left to right say, before returning) of:
(pitch diameter) x (pi) / 2
or
(rack tooth pitch) x (number of original pinion teeth) / 2

This mechanism is really not very nice. Although it appears to be simple, its motion is quite violent. At the end of each stroke there is infinite acceleration. In the animation, it looks smooth, but that's only because the rack has no mass.

So if I had a pitch diameter of (0.1m) x (pi) / 2 = 0.1571 m/s? Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Jones1987 said:
So if I had a pitch diameter of (0.1m) x (pi) / 2 = 0.1571 m/s? Is this correct?

I expect that travel should be 0.157 m.
Why are you suggesting the answer is in m/s?
 
So does it mean the pitch circle is 0.157m or the distance the rack moves is 0.157m per revolution?
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top