Finding Point for Adding Forces Acting on Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter rew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the point of application for resultant forces acting on an object when the forces are not parallel. The user describes a scenario with two forces applied at different points, leading to a resultant force that affects the object but is not necessarily at the origin. They seek a method to calculate the specific point where the resultant force acts, particularly when considering the effects of torque and rotation on the object. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector addition and torque in physics to resolve practical problems. Ultimately, while the theoretical understanding is achieved, the user expresses frustration over the practical implications of the findings.
rew
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've searched the forum, and found several topics about adding vectors. This one is not as easy... :-)

Suppose I have an object. There are two forces acting upon it. One is acting on a point at -5,0 and the other at +5, 0. The one at -5,0 has magnitude sqrt(17), pointing up (positive y) 4 units and towards the origin 1 unit. The one at +5,0 is pointing -1,4 also sqrt(17) N.

Now I can add the vectors, and I end up with an 0,8 vector of resultant force. However, where does this resultant force act? In this case it will be on the Y-axis, but where?

When the forces are parallel I can find the resulting point: say 1N (0,1) at -1,0 and 3N (0,3) at 3,0 will result in 4N (0,4) in the origin. But how do I find the resulting point if the forces are not parallel ?

Now, back to my original situation. If I add an 0,-8 force in the origin, the total force will be zero. Total moment as well.

However if that force is tilted, say in the -1,-4 direction, do I get a moment around the origin? I think I do. I think I could model this resulting moment by finding a point where the resulting 8N force acts.

Can someone explain how I can find that point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ehmm no. I can add vectors just fine.

Let me try to paraprase my question.

Suppose I have an object (if you want, the object can be defined as -6<x<6;-1<y<1, a 12x2 rectangle). If I push on it on the left side (force vector (0,4)), it will start to move forward, but also turn clockwise. If I push on it on the right side (again (0,4)), it will also move forward, but start to rotate counterclockwise.

So where a force acts upon an object makes a difference.

So given the two vector forces (1, 4) and (-1, 4) I can add them together: (0, 8) Vector addition.

What we're doing here, is we have multiple forces and "simplify" things by calculating a resulting force.

However, besides a magnitude, a resulting force also has an resulting point where it affects the object.

If the forces (0,4) and (0,4) affect an object at -5,0 and 5,0 the resulting force will be (0,8) affecting the object at the origin ( 0,0 ).

However, when those forces affecting the object at -5,0 and 5,0 are not (0,4) but (1, 4) and (-1, 4) I suspect that the point where the resulting force (again (0,8)) can be thought to affect the object is not at the origin, but somewhere on the positive Y axis.

I want to be able to calculate that point.
 
Last edited:
If each Fi is applied at location ri, then the total torque on the object is given by ΣrixFi. Then your total force, ΣFi can be applied to any point r, such that rxΣFi = ΣrixFi. You will find that in 2D, there is an entire line of such points. Usually, you take r to be perpendicular to ΣFi, which gives you a unique effective arm.

x denotes cross product, if it's not clear. In 2D, it is a scalar quantity, and can be found thus.

axb = axby-aybx
 
Thanks! In the practical problem I'm trying to solve, I think this results in "doesn't work". So I'm happy I can now solve the physics involved, but not happy that the physics doesn't solve my problem. :-)
(As you can see from the smiley, for me the theoretical "problem solved" outweighs the practical "have to find another solution")
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top