Finding R1 and R2 in a Voltage Divider Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdawg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about finding R1 and R2 in a voltage divider circuit, the output voltage is given as 20V without load and 19.192V with a load of 380Ω. The user initially attempts to solve for R1 and R2 using voltage divider equations but struggles with algebraic manipulation, particularly when substituting R1 in terms of R2. A suggestion is made to use Thevenin's theorem to simplify the problem, which could provide clearer expressions for the circuit parameters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the voltage divider formula and considering alternative methods when faced with difficulties. Ultimately, the correct values for R1 and R2 are determined to be 80Ω and 20Ω, respectively.
jdawg
Messages
366
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider the voltage divider circuit below. The output voltage is with V0 =20v with RL removed ( RL= ∞Ω) from the circuit. With RL in the circuit and RL=380Ω , the output voltage is V 0=19.192 v . Determine values for R1 and R2. I attached a picture of the circuit.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For RL=∞Ω
20=100((R1)/(R1+R2))

For RL=380Ω
19.192=(100)((380//R2)/(380//R2)+R1))

Am I on the right track with this? I tried to make a substitution by solving for R1, but it came out really messed up.
Is there a better way to work this problem?

Here is the answer: R1=80Ω R2=20Ω
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach looks fine, but check your voltage divider equation for the unloaded circuit. The output is across R2, right?
 
  • Like
Likes jdawg
Ohh ok! I fixed my unloaded circuit equation and came up with R1=4R2

I think something might be wrong with my RL=380Ω equation though. I substituted R1=4R2 and wound up with -497.56. I've redone my algebra three times and keep getting the wrong answer.
 
Sometimes when you hit a barrier due to a slip you can't see, it can help to change the approach slightly to take a different path to the solution. Why not try first reducing the voltage and R1, R2 to a Thevenin equivalent? You'll have two expressions for Vth and Rth (involving R1 and R2) but the result will be a purely series connected circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes jdawg
Thanks!
 
Back
Top