Finding Radius of Circular Movement w/ Angle & Angular Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the radius of circular movement using the angle of the cord (α) and angular velocity (ω). The derived formula for the radius (R) is R = g*tg(α)/ω², which raises questions about the lack of dependence on the cord and bar lengths. It is clarified that while R appears independent of these lengths, they are actually encoded in α; as the cord length increases, α also increases, affecting R. A geometric relationship can be established to explicitly show R's dependence on the lengths of the cord and the horizontal bar, but solving this relationship is complex. Ultimately, both geometric and physical approaches require additional information to determine R accurately.
Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
in the following question,

http://62.90.118.184/Index.asp?CategoryID=318

i am given the following only:
angle of the cord = \alpha
angular velocity = \omega

and am asked to find the radius

what i did was :
Newtons 2nd on the radial and "y" axis

Fy=T*cos(\alpha)-mg=0 (T being tension in the cord)
T=mg/cos(\alpha)

Fr = T*sin(\alpha) = mar =m\omega2R

T*sin(\alpha) =m\omega2R

now i use the T i found (T=mg/cos(\alpha)) and i get
mg*tg(\alpha)=m\omega2R

R=g*tg(\alpha)/\omega2

which according to the answer sheet is the correct answer, but i cannot understand how the radius does not depend on the length of the cord or the length of the top, horizontal bar??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dell said:
but i cannot understand how the radius does not depend on the length of the cord or the length of the top, horizontal bar??

The radius does depend on those quantities, but their value is encoded in the value of \alpha. If \omega is fixed and we increase the length of the cord then \alpha increases (and if we decrease the length of the cord it decreases). Similarly, for a fixed \omega, an increase in the length of the horizontal bar will increase \alpha. The physics of what is happening (spinning a mass on a string) means that the value of \alpha has a dependency on these quantities.

If you wanted, you could make this dependency explicit. From the geometry of the problem you can show that,

<br /> \operatorname{tg}{\alpha}=\frac{R-a}{\sqrt{b^2-\left(R-a\right)^2}}<br />

where a is the length of the horizontal bar and b is the length of the cord. If you substitute this into your answer then you can get an expression for R that depends explicitly on a and b instead of \alpha. However rearranging the answer involves solving a quartic equation for R which is not easy.

As an interesting aside, note that understanding the physics doesn't give us any 'information for free'. If we are given \alpha then to find R geometrically we require two more pieces of information: the length of the horizontal bar and the length of the string. To find R from \alpha using instead the physics of the situation, we still require two more pieces of information (the speed of rotation \omega and the downward acceleration the ball would experience if removed from the string, g).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top