Finding Reactions on Members Supported by Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter 385sk117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the reactions exerted on members by supports in a beam scenario. The total downward force acting on the beam is calculated to be 34N, leading to confusion about the negative value for the y-component of the force from the right support, suggesting it acts downward. Participants clarify that a pin support can indeed exert forces in both upward and downward directions, depending on the equilibrium conditions. The right support's design may allow for a downward reaction, which is consistent with Newton's third law. Overall, the calculations are validated, and the mechanics of support reactions are discussed in detail.
385sk117
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the reactions exerted on the members by the supports.



Homework Equations


Sigma Fx = Net force acting on x-axis = 0
Sigma Fy = Net force acting on y-axis = 0
Sigma M = Net Moments = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



10N/m -> changes to 4N at centre acting downward so total force acting downward is 34N
the Sum of two y component of two forces from suppors then equals to 34N
If I set the regarding point to be the point on the left supports, then total moment is
30 x 0.2 + 4 x 0.6 - 50 - Fy x 0.8 where Fy is the y component of force from the right support. But this gives negative value for Fy which means that the supporting force from the right side support is downward. How can this be true?
Any problem with my steps?

I neglected Fx as there is no movement of bar and only force acting in x direction is the x component of supporting from left support and that should be equals to 0
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 501
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
385sk117 said:

Homework Statement



Find the reactions exerted on the members by the supports.



Homework Equations


Sigma Fx = Net force acting on x-axis = 0
Sigma Fy = Net force acting on y-axis = 0
Sigma M = Net Moments = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



10N/m -> changes to 4N at centre acting downward so total force acting downward is 34N
the Sum of two y component of two forces from suppors then equals to 34N
If I set the regarding point to be the point on the left supports, then total moment is
30 x 0.2 + 4 x 0.6 - 50 - Fy x 0.8 where Fy is the y component of force from the right support. But this gives negative value for Fy which means that the supporting force from the right side support is downward. How can this be true?
Any problem with my steps?

I neglected Fx as there is no movement of bar and only force acting in x direction is the x component of supporting from left support and that should be equals to 0
You are quite correct, a pin support can have vertical loads up or down, as long as the beam is pinned to it, and the support is pinned to the floor. The right support keeps it from rotating ccw. If the beam just rested on the right support, without a pin, or if the pin support just rested on the floor, it could not be in equilibrium. Sometimes the symbol for a roller support is misleading
 
Last edited:
Hi 385sk117! :smile:
385sk117 said:
If I set the regarding point to be the point on the left supports, then total moment is
30 x 0.2 + 4 x 0.6 - 50 - Fy x 0.8 where Fy is the y component of force from the right support. But this gives negative value for Fy which means that the supporting force from the right side support is downward. How can this be true?

Your calculations look fine to me … the 50 N.m anticlockwise couple is easily more than the weights, so the net couple will be anticlockwise. :confused:

I notice that the "support" on the RHS is a different design to the one on the LHS … perhaps it's meant to be some sort of hook, that can exert a downward reaction?
 
PhanthomJay said:
You are quite correct, a pin support can have vertical loads up or down, as long as the beam is pinned to it. The right support keeps it from rotating ccw. If the beam just rested on the right support, without a pin, it could not be in equilibrium.

Oh so the force is actually acting downwards on the right support? I thought that because it is the force that is supporting the bar, it must acting upwards.
Thanks
 
385sk117 said:
Oh so the force is actually acting downwards on the right support? I thought that because it is the force that is supporting the bar, it must acting upwards.
Thanks
Just watch your terminology: The right support exerts a downward force on the beam, and the beam exerts an upward force on the right support, per Newton 3. As Tiny Tim has noted, the support may be a hook of sorts, capable of exerting that downward force on the beam.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top