Finding Relations for Net Force with Two Exerted Forces at 150 Degrees Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nanoath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
To determine the relationship between the magnitudes of two forces exerted at a 150-degree angle, the net force must equal the magnitude of the larger force, F1. Setting up a coordinate system is essential for analyzing the forces in terms of their components. By placing F1 along the positive x-axis, the components of both forces can be added to find the net force. The Pythagorean theorem is used to calculate the magnitude of the resultant vector. Clarification is needed on whether the inequality regarding the forces is a strict constraint, as this affects the solution.
Nanoath
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The directions of two forces \vec{F_{1}} and \vec{F_{2}} (with F1 > F2) that are exerted at a point from angle of 150 degrees between them. Find the relations that must exist between the magnitudes of these forces \vec{F_{1}} and \vec{F_{2}} so that the net force has a magnitude equal to that of \vec{F_{1}} .

Homework Equations


\sum\vec{F}=0

The Attempt at a Solution


none so far.
-----------
Need help getting started..
-----------
\vec{F_{1}} = \vec{F_{1}} + \vec{F_{2}} I think this is what the problem is stating, but wouldn't that mean F2 = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start out by setting up a coordinate system to place the vectors in so you can analyze them in terms of components. To simplify things, try directing F1 along the positive x axis.

To find the net force vector just add the components. Use the pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude of the net force vector. You want the magnitude of that force to equal the magnitude F1.

The only "problem" I seem to run into with this question is that I'm not sure the inequality you introduced in the problem statement is a constraint that must always be satisfied. If that is the case, there is only one answer and your guess is correct, but not for the reasons I think you are thinking.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top