What is the Internal Resistance of the Battery in this Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gbox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the internal resistance of a battery in a circuit with two voltmeters and three ammeters, where specific current readings indicate certain relationships between the circuit components. The circuit analysis employs Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to derive equations based on the given conditions, particularly noting that ammeters A2 and A3 show zero current. Participants emphasize the significance of the voltage readings and the implications of zero current on the potential differences across resistors. The conversation highlights the need to simplify the approach by recognizing the relationships between resistors in parallel branches and how they affect voltage division. Ultimately, the analysis aims to clarify the connections between resistances and the overall circuit behavior to find the internal resistance of the battery.
Gbox
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The two voltmeters have very large resistance, the 3 ampere meter have resistance of ##0.5\Omega## each one.
##V_1## show twice as much voltage as ##V_2##, ##A_1## shows ##0.4A## and ##A_2=A_3=0A##

a. Find ##R_2##
b. Find the internal resistance of the battery

6XJIiIn.jpg

Homework Equations


KVL and KCL
Thevenin and Norton
Pi-T

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I did not saw a reason to use Thevenin or Norton, because ##A_2=A_3=0A## I can look at the circuit like this:

JD98F0M.jpg


And to start with KVL and KCL:

1) ##0.4=I_2+I_3##
2) ##1.6-0.4r-R_1*I_2-5I_2-R_2*I_2=0##
3) ##1.6-0.4r-2I_3-2.5I_3-R_3*I_3=0##
4) ##2V_2=V1\rightarrow 1.6-0.4r=5I_3##
5) ##A_2=0A## so there is also not voltage so ##R_1*I_2+2*I_3=0##
6)##A_3=0A## so there is also not voltage so ##R_2*I_2+R_3*I_3=0##

But I am left with unknowns
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ω Did you use the 2.5 Ω and the 5 Ω ? if there is no current in A2 and A3, what does that say about the currents through those two knowns ?
 
I used ##2.5 \Omega## in equation 3 and ##5 \Omega## in equation 2.

If there is no current, there is no voltage, I used this in equations 5 and 6
 
You can do some more sleuthing before you start writing loop equations. As you have deduced, the zero amp readings of the ammeters A2 and A3 tell you that the potentials at the corresponding junctions of the resistor branches must be the same. That is, the two resistor branches split the potential difference across the branch in the same way in both branches. That should tell you something about the relationship between corresponding resistors in each branch (think ratios and scaling).

Further, the fact that the potential across the middle resistors is half that of V1 tells you something else about the resistors in each branch. Look at what V1 is measuring.
 
Gbox said:
If there is no current, there is no voltage, I used this in equations 5 and 6
Gbox said:
5) A2=0AA_2=0A so there is also not voltage so R1∗I2+2∗I3=0R_1*I_2+2*I_3=0
6)A3=0AA_3=0A so there is also not voltage so R2∗I2+R3∗I3=0R_2*I_2+R_3*I_3=0
You have sign errors in those.

It appears that you're going about this in an overly complicated fashion.

If no current passes through A2 or A3, then how do the voltage drops across the 5Ω and 2.5Ω resistors compare?

You should be able to express the current through the 2.5Ω resistor (I3) in terms of V2 .
 
gneill said:
You can do some more sleuthing before you start writing loop equations. As you have deduced, the zero amp readings of the ammeters A2 and A3 tell you that the potentials at the corresponding junctions of the resistor branches must be the same. That is, the two resistor branches split the potential difference across the branch in the same way in both branches. That should tell you something about the relationship between corresponding resistors in each branch (think ratios and scaling).

Further, the fact that the potential across the middle resistors is half that of V1 tells you something else about the resistors in each branch. Look at what V1 is measuring.
So I can say that ##0.4A*\frac{R_1}{R_1+2}##?

As for the voltmeter I can say that ##2*I_3+2*2.5*I_3+R_3*I_3=1.6-0.4r##?
 
Gbox said:
So I can say that ##0.4A*\frac{R_1}{R_1+2}##?
That's not an equation...
As for the voltmeter I can say that ##2*I_3+2*2.5*I_3+R_3*I_3=1.6-0.4r##?
No equations yet! What is the voltmeter V1 across? It reads the branch voltage for ALL branches, right? They are parallel branches.

Back to the resistors:
If both branches divide the branch voltage in the same way, then all the resistor ratios in one branch must be duplicated in the other. For example, in the bottom branch the first two resistors have ratio 2/2.5. Then the middle branch's first two resistors must have the same ratio. So R1/5 = 2/2.5. What's R1? In fact, the resistors in one branch must be related to the corresponding resistors in the other branch by a single scaling factor (what is it?).

Note that V1 is the whole branch voltage, and the middle resistor of each branch is said to drop half of it. What does that tell you about the the rest of the resistance in each branch? (Hint: Remember how a voltage divider works).
 
Back
Top