Finding Speed of two objects in space

  • Thread starter Thread starter MellowOne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of two baseballs in space as they move closer together from a distance of 1170 m to 710 m. The user initially uses the universal law of gravity and Newton's second law to find the gravitational force and acceleration, but questions whether constant acceleration can be assumed. It is clarified that the acceleration changes as the balls approach each other due to the varying gravitational force, making it inappropriate to use kinematic equations for the entire motion. The conservation of energy approach is suggested as a more suitable method, emphasizing the transition from potential energy to kinetic energy. Understanding this energy conservation principle is key to solving the problem effectively.
MellowOne
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two baseballs, each with a mass of 0.135 kg, are separated by a distance of 1170 m in outer space. If the balls are released from rest, what speed do they have when their separation has decreased to 710 m? Ignore the gravitational effects from any other objects.


Homework Equations


Universal law of gravity, Newton's 2nd law, Kinematics


The Attempt at a Solution


As of now, I've used the universal law of gravity and found that Fg = 3.55767e-18N. Using this force I found acceleration by using Newton's 2nd law of F = ma. The acceleration found was 2.632e-17m/s^2. Using this acceleration is it possible to use the 3rd kinematics of Vf^2 = vi^2 +2a(delta x) to solve for Vf?? Is this the way to solve this problem or am I completely off track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vf^2 = vi^2 +2a(delta x) only applies for constant acceleration.
Is this a constant acceleration problem?

An energy approach might be better.
 
We havn't really learned about energy. Could you explain how I would approach this problem? Thanks
 
When the two baseballs are kept at a certain distance the system of balls has some potential energy. When they are released. their PE decreases and KE increases. Apply the law of conservation of energy.
 
MellowOne said:
We havn't really learned about energy. Could you explain how I would approach this problem? Thanks

Your original idea is correct...but only instantaneously.

Starting from rest,
you calculated the force on each ball [which depends on the separation-squared],
then determined the acceleration of each ball. So, each ball gets accelerated and approach each other.

In the next instant of time, each ball has attained a velocity, but since their separation has decreased, the magnitude of the force on each has increased, and so, the magnitude of acceleration has increased. Acceleration is not a constant here...so you can't apply your velocity-squared formula throughout the motion... although you can apply it for a little bit of the motion...then repeat. This will become a calculus problem...which can be later interpreted as a special case of energy conservation.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
956
Replies
78
Views
9K
Back
Top