Finding stationary points. no x in second derivative

navm1
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Just started getting introduced to calculus and a couple applications. After I've found the stationary point i understand that i can put the x value into the second derivative to find if its a maximum or minimum point. i.e

12x-2x2
ƒ'(x)= 12-4x
12-4x=0
x=3
so 12(3)-2(3)2 = 18
So if I've worked it out correct then the stationary point is 3,18


The Attempt at a Solution


So if i take the second derivative i have

ƒ''(x)= -4

if there's no x in the second derivative then how do I find out whether it's a maximum or minimum value?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always plot the original function.
 
navm1 said:

Homework Statement


Just started getting introduced to calculus and a couple applications. After I've found the stationary point i understand that i can put the x value into the second derivative to find if its a maximum or minimum point. i.e

12x-2x2
ƒ'(x)= 12-4x
12-4x=0
x=3
so 12(3)-2(3)2 = 18
So if I've worked it out correct then the stationary point is 3,18


The Attempt at a Solution


So if i take the second derivative i have

ƒ''(x)= -4

if there's no x in the second derivative then how do I find out whether it's a maximum or minimum value?

Thanks
You can use the 2nd derivative to determine if a critical point is a local maximum or minimum. Your textbook should have this test and some examples. Also, y = 12x - 2x2 is a very simple function. A quick sketch of its graph, as SteamKing suggests, will show immediately what's going on.
 
navm1 said:

So if i take the second derivative i have

ƒ''(x)= -4

if there's no x in the second derivative then how do I find out whether it's a maximum or minimum value?

Thanks


You ask yourself whether ##-4## is positive or negative for concavity.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top