Finding stopping distance given coefficient of kinetic friction and mass

AI Thread Summary
To determine the stopping distance of a bobsled given the coefficient of kinetic friction and mass, the work-energy theorem is applicable. The bobsled, starting from rest, experiences negligible friction until point D, after which it encounters a kinetic friction coefficient of µk = 0.4. The mass of the bobsled is 210 kg, and the energy lost due to friction must equal the work done against it. Calculating the work done by friction will help find the distance x beyond point D where the bobsled comes to a halt. This approach effectively combines energy conservation principles with frictional force calculations.
disque
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Bobsled

A bobsled run leads down a hill as sketched in the figure above. Between points A and D, friction is negligible. Between points D and E at the end of the run, the coefficient of kinetic friction is µk = 0.4. The mass of the bobsled with drivers is 210 kg and it starts from rest at point A.

Find the distance x beyond point D at which the bobsled will come to a halt.


Homework Equations


PE=mgy
(delta)x = ½ v_o2/ mg


The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the bottom equation should be the right approach but I don't know how to find the velocity given the coefficient of kinetic friction and mass of the sled
 

Attachments

  • pic.gif
    pic.gif
    11.2 KB · Views: 716
Physics news on Phys.org
disque said:
A bobsled run leads down a hill as sketched in the figure above. Between points A and D, friction is negligible. Between points D and E at the end of the run, the coefficient of kinetic friction is µk = 0.4. The mass of the bobsled with drivers is 210 kg and it starts from rest at point A.

Find the distance x beyond point D at which the bobsled will come to a halt.

Hi disque! :smile:

(I can't see the picture yet)

This is an energy question …

calculate the the work done by friction,

and use the work-energy theorem, which says that loss of energy equals work done. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top