Finding the 3x3 Matrix X for XA=B: A Scientist's Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter hogrampage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3x3 Matrix
hogrampage
Messages
107
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement

Find the 3x3 matrix X such that XA=B, where

Code:
      1 1  1
A=   -1 0 -2
      1 0 -1

      1 3  0
B=   -2 1 -2
      1 4 -1

The attempt at a solution

I understand how to do AX=B just fine, but XA=B is confusing me. I tried doing [x y z] A, but not sure if that's even right or what to do after that. Yes, I know it can be solved using inverses or whatever, but the professor does not want us to solve it that way (haven't gone over inverses yet).

The solution for X such that AX=B involved finding individual columns, so does that mean XA=B will find the individual rows?

Any help is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hogrampage said:
Homework Statement

Find the 3x3 matrix X such that XA=B, where

Code:
      1 1  1
A=   -1 0 -2
      1 0 -1

      1 3  0
B=   -2 1 -2
      1 4 -1

The attempt at a solution

I understand how to do AX=B just fine, but XA=B is confusing me. I tried doing [x y z] A, but not sure if that's even right or what to do after that. Yes, I know it can be solved using inverses or whatever, but the professor does not want us to solve it that way (haven't learned gone over inverses yet).

The solution for X such that AX=B involved finding individual columns, so does that mean XA=B will find the individual rows?

Any help is appreciated!

Yes, find the individual rows of X. How would you do it?

ehild
 
If I multiply

\begin{array}{cccc}
1 & 1 & 1 \\
-1 & 0 & -2 \\
1 & 0 & -1 \\
\end{array}

by
\begin{array}{cccc}
x & y & z
\end{array}

I get

\begin{array}{cccc}
(x-y+z) & (x) & (x-2y-z) \\
\end{array}

That's where I get stuck. I don't know what to do with it. Would I transpose it to this?:\begin{array}{cccc}
(x-y+z) \\
(x) \\
(x-2y-z) \\
\end{array}
 
Transpose both sides.
 
Okay, I transposed both sides and I see how to get each column of X now. I think I get it :). Here's my augmented matrix:

\begin{array}{cccc}
1 & 0 & 0 | & 3 & 1 & 4 \\
0 & 1 & 3 | & 1 & 0 & 2 \\
0 & 0 & -4 | & 1 & 3 & 1 \\
\end{array}

The last row seems wrong because of the -4, but if I change it to a 1 using row operations, then the answer is wrong. The correct answer is:

\begin{array}{cccc}
3 & 1 & 1 \\
1 & 0 & 3 \\
4 & 2 & 1\\
\end{array}
 
Last edited:
Edit: another way to solve this is to multiply both sides by ##A^{-1}## from the right.

Sorry, it seems that I almost forgot one property of matrix inverse :)
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top