Finding the area of a circular strip

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gabe805
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Circular
AI Thread Summary
To find the area of a circular strip, the correct method involves calculating the area of the outer circle and subtracting the area of the inner circle, represented by the formula pi(a^2) - pi(b^2). The alternative method of using 2pi*radius*thickness is not valid unless the thickness is infinitesimal, as it assumes the strip can be flattened into a rectangle. When the inner and outer radii differ significantly, this assumption fails, leading to incorrect results. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the geometric implications of the strip's thickness in area calculations. Accurate area determination requires recognizing the limitations of different formulas based on the strip's dimensions.
Gabe805
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs7165/art/qb/qu/c29/pict_29_93.gif
if I wanted to find the area of the outer circular strip, I know I would just take the area of the composite and subtract out the inner radius. (i.e. pi(a^2)-pi(b^2)). However why can't I use 2pi*radius*thickness? this would be 2pi*a(a-b) which is obviously not the same.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Gabe805 said:
However why can't I use 2pi*radius*thickness? this would be 2pi*a(a-b) which is obviously not the same.
Of course not if the thickness is not infinitesimal. The "2pi*radius*thickness" comes from assuming that the strip can be stretched out to make a long rectangle, which is obviously not possible if the inner and outer radius are not infinitesimally different.
 
  • Like
Likes Gabe805
blue_leaf77 said:
Of course not if the thickness is not infinitesimal. The "2pi*radius*thickness" comes from assuming that the strip can be stretched out to make a long rectangle, which is obviously not possible if the inner and outer radius are not infinitesimally different.

Yeah, I had a hunch it had something to do with that. If the inner and outer radii are different, then it doesn't wind up being a rectangle. Thanks for the reply.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top