MHB Finding the Equation of a Plane Perpendicular to a Given Line

  • Thread starter Thread starter brunette15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
brunette15
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find an equation for a plane that passes through the point (2, 1, 5) however is also perpendicular to the line that passes through the points A(0, 1, 1) and B(1,-1,-1).

I am unsure how to begin with this. I have started by finding the normal vector to A and B = (0,1,-1), to find the direction of the plane and don't really know what to do from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My suggestion would be:

Step 1: Use the two points $A$ and $B$ on the straight line to determine the direction of the line.
Step 2: Since the plane is perpendicular to the line, the direction of the line is a normal to the plane. If we let $(a,b,c)$ be your computed normal to the plane then the equation of the plane is given by: $ax+by+cz=d$, where $d$ is still unknown.
Step 3: Last step is to find $d$, but that is now straightforward since the plane passes through the point $(2,1,5)$ and thus $2a+b+5c=d$.
 
Siron said:
My suggestion would be:

Step 1: Use the two points $A$ and $B$ on the straight line to determine the direction of the line.
Step 2: Since the plane is perpendicular to the line, the direction of the line is a normal to the plane. If we let $(a,b,c)$ be your computed normal to the plane then the equation of the plane is given by: $ax+by+cz=d$, where $d$ is still unknown.
Step 3: Last step is to find $d$, but that is now straightforward since the plane passes through the point $(2,1,5)$ and thus $2a+b+5c=d$.

Thankyou so much!
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Back
Top