Finding the equation of motion of a given Lagrangian

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Given the Lagrangian ##\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}##, where ##\Phi=\Phi(x)##, find the equation of motion of the system. Assume that the field ##\Phi## is spherically symmetric, i.e. ##\Phi = \Phi(r)##.

Homework Equations



The Euler-Lagrange equation of motion for a scalar field

The Attempt at a Solution



##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

The spherical volume element in ##4-##dimensional Euclidean space is ##d^{4}x = r^{3}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1})\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2})\ dr\ d\phi_{1}\ d\phi_{2}\ d\phi_{3}##.

Therefore, ##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{3}\ \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{2}\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2}) \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{1}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1}) \int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=(2\pi)(2)\bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}\bigg)\int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##.

Am I correct so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
failexam said:

Homework Statement



Given the Lagrangian ##\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}##, where ##\Phi=\Phi(x)##, find the equation of motion of the system. Assume that the field ##\Phi## is spherically symmetric, i.e. ##\Phi = \Phi(r)##.

Homework Equations



The Euler-Lagrange equation of motion for a scalar field

The Attempt at a Solution



##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

The spherical volume element in ##4-##dimensional Euclidean space is ##d^{4}x = r^{3}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1})\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2})\ dr\ d\phi_{1}\ d\phi_{2}\ d\phi_{3}##.

Therefore, ##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{3}\ \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{2}\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2}) \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{1}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1}) \int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=(2\pi)(2)\bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}\bigg)\int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##.

Am I correct so far?
Why do you bother with the volume element? Just apply the E-L equation to the Lagrangian density an you will directly get the equation of motion.
 
If I don't bother with the volume element, won't the crucial factor of ##r'^{2}## in the Lagrangian density be missing?
 
failexam said:
If I don't bother with the volume element, won't the crucial factor of ##r'^{2}## in the Lagrangian density be missing?
Hi,

The least action principle leads to the Euler-Lagrange equations which are conditions to what is integrated over all space. So there is no need to do anything with the volume element, ##d^4x##.

The E-L equations are

##\frac{\partial {\cal{L}}}{\partial \phi} - \partial_\mu \frac{\partial {\cal{ L}}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} = 0 ##
 
I understand that.

But wouldn't the equation of motion take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates, due to the radial symmetry of the potential?
 
failexam said:
But wouldn't the equation of motion take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates, due to the radial symmetry of the potential?

Yes, the equation of motion will take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates. But as nrqed said, you should first derive the Euler-Lagrange equation and then impose the spherical symmetry (actually this just means to replace the d'Alembert operator by a double derivative with respect to "r").
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top