Finding the Equilibrium Separation in a Diatomic Molecule: A Scientific Approach

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the equilibrium separation in a diatomic molecule using the potential energy equation U = (A/r^12) - (B/r^6). The participant initially differentiates this equation to find the force, resulting in F(x) = (12A/r^13) + (6B/r^7), and seeks clarification on how to find the value of r that makes the force zero. After some algebraic manipulation, they conclude that the equilibrium separation is given by r = (2A/B)^(1/6). The discussion also touches on the behavior of atomic forces, noting that a larger separation results in a negative force (attractive) and a smaller separation results in a positive force (repulsive). Visualizing the potential energy function is suggested to better understand the relationship between potential energy and atomic separation.
Ginny Mac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Oh boy...this problem has stumped me. I am not even sure I know where to start:

The potential energy of a diatomic molecule (a two-atom system like H2 or O2) is given by
U= (A/r^12) - (B/r^6)

where r is the separation of the two atoms of the molecule and A and B are positive constants. This potential energy is associated with the force that binds the two atoms together.
(a) Find the equilibrium separation - that is, the distance between the atoms at which the force on each atom is zero. Is the force repulsive (atoms are pushed apart) or attractive (atoms are pulled together) if their separation is (b) smaller and (c) larger than the equilibrium separation?

Okay. I started out thinking that because we are looking for the force, we would need to use F(x) = - (d/dx)(U(x)), and after differentiation

F(x) = (12A/r^13) + (6B/r^7)

So here is the big "now what?" Please help. Thank you - any help is greatly appreciated.
~Gin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ginny Mac said:
(a) Find the equilibrium separation - that is, the distance between the atoms at which the force on each atom is zero.
[snip]

Okay. I started out thinking that because we are looking for the force, we would need to use F(x) = - (d/dx)(U(x)), and after differentiation

F(x) = (12A/r^13) + (6B/r^7)

So here is the big "now what?" Please help. Thank you - any help is greatly appreciated.
~Gin

You have the next step: you said "Find ... the distance between the atoms at which the force on each atom is zero." (that is, find the value of r that makes F=0)
 
okay...but there are three unknowns in my equation... Is there a step I am leaving out?? Even solving algebraically only reduces down to 2A-Br^6 = 0. Does something cancel out that I am not aware of? Or maybe we are supposed to be left with an equation?
 
You are told "A and B are positive constants". So, you can expect that your answer is in terms of those positive [but otherwise unspecified] constants.
 
Ahhh...so I got my equation down to (2A/B)^(1/6) = r. So that value of r is the equilibrium separation. Now for the next part, figuring out atomic behaviors based on larger/smaller values in relation to equilibrium sep. This should be interesting.

Equation: 2A-Br^6=0

If sep. is larger than equilibrium, we should have a negative force, and if it is smaller than eq., we should have a positive force. I think a negative force will draw the atoms together (?) Any thoughts are appreciated. Thank ya'll.

gin
 
Can you sketch the potential energy function U= (A/r^12) - (B/r^6) vs separation r, and locate your special value of r?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Thread 'Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes'

TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
View full post »

Similar threads

Potential energy equation to force equation?
Replies
4
Views
4K
Potential energy of an electrostatic system in equilibrium
Replies
14
Views
1K
Understanding the generic nature of linearity in Physics
Replies
2
Views
985
What is the equilibrium distance between atoms in a two-atom molecule?
Replies
5
Views
5K
Lennard-Jones Potential: Equilibrium Distance and Dissociation Work
Replies
15
Views
7K
How to graph potential energy for 2 atoms in diatomic molecule w/ 3 unknowns
Replies
1
Views
6K
Lennard-Jones Work: Calculating Equilibrium Position
Replies
14
Views
2K
RMS displacement of a diatomic atom
Replies
2
Views
2K
Estimating the vibrational frequency of Hydrogen molecule
Replies
2
Views
13K
Oscillations of Covalent Molecules
Replies
6
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top