Finding the Initial Velocity of a Basketball Shot Using Freefall Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial velocity of a basketball shot using projectile motion equations. A player shoots the ball at a 50-degree angle from a height of 2 meters, aiming for a hoop 8 meters away and 3 meters high. Initial calculations incorrectly equate horizontal displacement with horizontal velocity, leading to confusion. Participants suggest forming two equations based on horizontal and vertical motion to solve for the initial velocity and time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly substituting variables and maintaining clarity in equations for accurate results.
VaioZ
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello first time posting in the Physics forum!

1. Homework Statement

A varsity player is attempting to make a shot. The ball leaves the hands of the player at an angle of 50 degrees to the horizontal at an elevation of 2 meters above the floor. The skillful player makes the shot with the ball traveling precisely through the center of the ring (8 meters from the player and 3 meters above the floor). To loud cheers, calculate the speed at which the ball left the hands of the player. Sketch the problem!

Homework Equations


Y=Vot-1/2g(t)^2
Voy = Vosintheta
Vox = Vocostheta

The Attempt at a Solution


ON0PJMy.png

Vox = Vocostheta -> 8=Vocos(50degrees) -> Vo=12.446m/s
Then I plug it to X=Vot+1/2at^2 a is always 0 right? So it becomes X=Vot -> X=12.446(t) -> t=(0.643s)
Then I plug the time to the y equation of free fall.. Delta Y is 1 right? Because 3-2=1
Y=Vot-1/2gt -> 1=Vo(0.643)-1/2(9.8)(0.643)^2 Vo=4.7059m/s
y
I'm not sure if my answer is right.. if not can someone guide me...
If it is wrong sorry If I got a wrong answer.. This is why I post in this forums.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello VZ, welcome to PF :smile: !

Always a good idea to include dimensions in your calculations -- and to check them. In your case, you go off the rails in the very first line (sorry to say):

## 8 \;{\rm m} = V_{0,x} = V_0 \cos\theta \;{\rm m/s}## can never be right !

Thing to do is write expressions for x(t) = 8 m and y(t) = 3 m, and eliminate t. Best to work with symbols until you have an expression for ##\theta##. Then check the dimensions and do the calculator work.

Oh, and: strange you should ask if your answer is right: I see two answers for v0
 
BvU said:
Hello VZ, welcome to PF :smile: !

Always a good idea to include dimensions in your calculations -- and to check them. In your case, you go off the rails in the very first line (sorry to say):

## 8 \;{\rm m} = V_{0,x} = V_0 \cos\theta \;{\rm m/s}## can never be right !

Thing to do is write expressions for x(t) = 8 m and y(t) = 3 m, and eliminate t. Best to work with symbols until you have an expression for ##\theta##. Then check the dimensions and do the calculator work.

Oh, and: strange you should ask if your answer is right: I see two answers for v0

I don't know what you mean by dimension buuuuuuut..
ΔX = Vo(t)
ΔY = Vo(t)-1/2(g)(t)^2

Do you mean that I should experiment with this two formulas? To get Vo? or to get t?
 
VaioZ said:
Vox = Vocostheta -> 8=Vocos(50degrees) -> Vo=12.446m/s
Then I plug it to X=Vot+1/2at^2 a is always 0 right? So it becomes X=Vot -> X=12.446(t) -> t=(0.643s)
Then I plug the time to the y equation of free fall.. Delta Y is 1 right? Because 3-2=1
Y=Vot-1/2gt -> 1=Vo(0.643)-1/2(9.8)(0.643)^2 Vo=4.7059m/s
y
I'm not sure if my answer is right.. if not can someone guide me...
If it is wrong sorry If I got a wrong answer.. This is why I post in this forums.
First - you have equated horizontal velocity to horizontal displacement . This is wrong .
So your second and third equations automatically become wrong .
 
Qwertywerty said:
First - you have equated horizontal velocity to horizontal displacement . This is wrong .
So your second and third equations automatically become wrong .

Yeap I realized that after sir BvU post. Sooooo if it is okay can you guide me in this question?
 
VaioZ said:
Yeap I realized that after sir BvU post. Sooooo if it is okay can you guide me in this question?
Consider two unknowns v and t . Obviously v represents velocity of object , and t the time taken to reach the hoop .

What you'll need to do is form two equations . Use the fact that horizontal velocity of object is v*cos(θ) and vertical v*sin(θ) .

Can you manage the two equations ?
 
Qwertywerty said:
Consider two unknowns v and t . Obviously v represents velocity of object , and t the time taken to reach the hoop .

What you'll need to do is form two equations . Use the fact that horizontal velocity of object is v*cos(θ) and vertical v*sin(θ) .

Can you manage the two equations ?

Okay will do! I'll update you if I'm done. Thank you
 
Qwertywerty said:
Consider two unknowns v and t . Obviously v represents velocity of object , and t the time taken to reach the hoop .

What you'll need to do is form two equations . Use the fact that horizontal velocity of object is v*cos(θ) and vertical v*sin(θ) .

Can you manage the two equations ?

SIR I THINK I GOT IT. Okay here goes

ΔX = Vox(t) right? bc a is always 0
ΔX/Vox = t but we know that Vox=VoCos50 and ΔX = 8
so 8/Vocos50 = t
Voy=Vosin50 right?
So
Δy=Voy(t)-1/2g(t)^2
3-2=(Vosin50)(Vocos50)-1/2(9.8)(Vocos50)^2
 
VaioZ said:
Δy=Voy(t)-1/2g(t)^2
3-2=(Vosin50)(Vocos50)-1/2(9.8)(Vocos50)^2
You need to substitute correctly for t .
 
  • #10
Qwertywerty said:
You need to substitute correctly for t .

typo 8/Vocos50 but it is right the context is still there..
 
  • #11
Yes it is .
 
  • #12
VaioZ said:
I don't know what you mean by dimension buuuuuuut..
ΔX = Vo(t)
ΔY = Vo(t)-1/2(g)(t)^2

Do you mean that I should experiment with this two formulas? To get Vo? or to get t?
No experimenting: you want to manipulate these two equations with two unknowns in such a way that you get one equation with one unknown, namely ##\theta##

The way you write them is confusing -- one Vo with two different meanings, and Vo(t) makes it look as if Vo is a function of t --$$
\Delta X = v_0 \cos\theta\; t \\ \Delta Y = v_0 \sin\theta\; t - {1\over 2} gt^2 $$ is a lot clearer. See also here

[edit] oops, I'm lagging. This is in response to post #3 -- a bit late.
 
  • Like
Likes Qwertywerty
Back
Top