Finding the Inverse of a Sum of Matrices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the matrix A given the equation (I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 2 \\ 4 & 5 \end{bmatrix}. The main issue addressed is the incorrect application of the distributive property of inverses, as exponents do not distribute over sums. The solution involves taking the inverse of both sides, leading to the calculation of A as A=\frac{B^{-1}-I}{2}, where B^{-1} is the inverse of the right-hand side matrix. The final result for A is \begin{bmatrix} \frac{-9}{13} & \frac{1}{13} \\ \frac{2}{13} & \frac{-6}{13}\end{bmatrix}, which satisfies the original equation. The discussion concludes with confirmation that this approach yields the correct result.
CentreShifter
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Inverse of a sum of matrices [solved]

The problem is relatively simple. Given the equation:

(I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 &amp; 2 \\ <br /> 4 &amp; 5 \end{bmatrix}

Find A.

My problem seems to be that I'm distributing the inverse on the LHS incorrectly. My real question then is, is the following correct?

(I+2A)^{-1}=I^{-1}+\frac{1}{2}A^{-1}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CentreShifter said:
The problem is relatively simple. Given the equation:

(I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 &amp; 2 \\ <br /> 4 &amp; 5 \end{bmatrix}

Find A.

My problem seems to be that I'm distributing the inverse on the LHS incorrectly. My real question then is, is the following correct?

(I+2A)^{-1}=I^{-1}+\frac{1}{2}A^{-1}
No. There is no distributive property for exponents, which is what you seem to be doing.

Since
(I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 &amp; 2 \\ <br /> 4 &amp; 5 \end{bmatrix}

The matrix on the right is clearly invertible, so why don't you take the inverse of both sides?
 
Well, exponents do distribute over products in some fashion, and there is the binomial theorem and its generalizations. But the first is not relevant and the second a long and torturous path for this problem.
 
I should have been more clear - that exponents don't distribute over a sum; in other words, that (A + B)n \neq An + Bn.
 
Beautiful.

Inverting both sides did the trick.

Inverse of the RHS is \begin{bmatrix}\frac{-5}{13} &amp; \frac{2}{13} \\ \frac{4}{13} &amp; \frac{1}{13} \end{bmatrix}. I'll call this B^{-1}

So then I'm left with
\begin{align}I+2A&amp;=B^{-1} \\<br /> <br /> 2A&amp;=B^{-1}-I \\<br /> <br /> A&amp;=\frac{B^{-1}-I}{2}=\begin{bmatrix} \frac{-9}{13} &amp; \frac{1}{13} \\ \frac{2}{13} &amp; \frac{-6}{13}\end{bmatrix} \end{align}

Plugging this into the original LHS yields the correct result. Thanks.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top