Finding the Inverse of a Sum of Matrices

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a matrix \( A \) given the equation \( (I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 2 \\ 4 & 5 \end{bmatrix} \). Participants are discussing the properties of matrix inverses and the correct application of these properties in the context of sums of matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the incorrect assumption that the inverse distributes over a sum, questioning the validity of applying the distributive property in this context. There is a suggestion to take the inverse of both sides of the equation as a potential approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with some participants providing guidance on the correct approach to take the inverse of both sides. There is acknowledgment of the initial misunderstanding regarding the distribution of inverses, and a participant reports successfully finding \( A \) after applying the suggested method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the properties of matrix operations, particularly in relation to sums and inverses. There is an emphasis on clarifying assumptions about matrix behavior in the context of the problem.

CentreShifter
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Inverse of a sum of matrices [solved]

The problem is relatively simple. Given the equation:

[tex](I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 & 2 \\ <br /> 4 & 5 \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Find A.

My problem seems to be that I'm distributing the inverse on the LHS incorrectly. My real question then is, is the following correct?

[tex](I+2A)^{-1}=I^{-1}+\frac{1}{2}A^{-1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CentreShifter said:
The problem is relatively simple. Given the equation:

[tex](I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 & 2 \\ <br /> 4 & 5 \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Find A.

My problem seems to be that I'm distributing the inverse on the LHS incorrectly. My real question then is, is the following correct?

[tex](I+2A)^{-1}=I^{-1}+\frac{1}{2}A^{-1}[/tex]
No. There is no distributive property for exponents, which is what you seem to be doing.

Since
[tex](I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 & 2 \\ <br /> 4 & 5 \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

The matrix on the right is clearly invertible, so why don't you take the inverse of both sides?
 
Well, exponents do distribute over products in some fashion, and there is the binomial theorem and its generalizations. But the first is not relevant and the second a long and torturous path for this problem.
 
I should have been more clear - that exponents don't distribute over a sum; in other words, that (A + B)n [itex]\neq[/itex] An + Bn.
 
Beautiful.

Inverting both sides did the trick.

Inverse of the RHS is [tex]\begin{bmatrix}\frac{-5}{13} & \frac{2}{13} \\ \frac{4}{13} & \frac{1}{13} \end{bmatrix}[/tex]. I'll call this [tex]B^{-1}[/tex]

So then I'm left with
[tex]\begin{align}I+2A&=B^{-1} \\<br /> <br /> 2A&=B^{-1}-I \\<br /> <br /> A&=\frac{B^{-1}-I}{2}=\begin{bmatrix} \frac{-9}{13} & \frac{1}{13} \\ \frac{2}{13} & \frac{-6}{13}\end{bmatrix} \end{align}[/tex]

Plugging this into the original LHS yields the correct result. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K