Finding the Inverse of a Sum of Matrices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the matrix A given the equation (I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} -1 & 2 \\ 4 & 5 \end{bmatrix}. The main issue addressed is the incorrect application of the distributive property of inverses, as exponents do not distribute over sums. The solution involves taking the inverse of both sides, leading to the calculation of A as A=\frac{B^{-1}-I}{2}, where B^{-1} is the inverse of the right-hand side matrix. The final result for A is \begin{bmatrix} \frac{-9}{13} & \frac{1}{13} \\ \frac{2}{13} & \frac{-6}{13}\end{bmatrix}, which satisfies the original equation. The discussion concludes with confirmation that this approach yields the correct result.
CentreShifter
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Inverse of a sum of matrices [solved]

The problem is relatively simple. Given the equation:

(I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 &amp; 2 \\ <br /> 4 &amp; 5 \end{bmatrix}

Find A.

My problem seems to be that I'm distributing the inverse on the LHS incorrectly. My real question then is, is the following correct?

(I+2A)^{-1}=I^{-1}+\frac{1}{2}A^{-1}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CentreShifter said:
The problem is relatively simple. Given the equation:

(I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 &amp; 2 \\ <br /> 4 &amp; 5 \end{bmatrix}

Find A.

My problem seems to be that I'm distributing the inverse on the LHS incorrectly. My real question then is, is the following correct?

(I+2A)^{-1}=I^{-1}+\frac{1}{2}A^{-1}
No. There is no distributive property for exponents, which is what you seem to be doing.

Since
(I+2A)^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix} <br /> -1 &amp; 2 \\ <br /> 4 &amp; 5 \end{bmatrix}

The matrix on the right is clearly invertible, so why don't you take the inverse of both sides?
 
Well, exponents do distribute over products in some fashion, and there is the binomial theorem and its generalizations. But the first is not relevant and the second a long and torturous path for this problem.
 
I should have been more clear - that exponents don't distribute over a sum; in other words, that (A + B)n \neq An + Bn.
 
Beautiful.

Inverting both sides did the trick.

Inverse of the RHS is \begin{bmatrix}\frac{-5}{13} &amp; \frac{2}{13} \\ \frac{4}{13} &amp; \frac{1}{13} \end{bmatrix}. I'll call this B^{-1}

So then I'm left with
\begin{align}I+2A&amp;=B^{-1} \\<br /> <br /> 2A&amp;=B^{-1}-I \\<br /> <br /> A&amp;=\frac{B^{-1}-I}{2}=\begin{bmatrix} \frac{-9}{13} &amp; \frac{1}{13} \\ \frac{2}{13} &amp; \frac{-6}{13}\end{bmatrix} \end{align}

Plugging this into the original LHS yields the correct result. Thanks.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top