Finding the Limit of ln((2x)^(2x))/(3x²+1) with x→∞

  • Thread starter Thread starter eric123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
eric123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the following limit: ln((2x)^(2x))/(3x²+1) with x>infinity.


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the following: lim ( ln((2x)^(2x))/(3x²+1) ) with x>infity =
lim ( (3x²+1)/ln((2x)^(2x)) ) with x>0
lim 2xln(2x) with x>0 = 0, therefore lim ( (3x²+1)/(2xln(2x)) with x>0 =
1/0 which is infinity, a simple plot however shows this is wrong, could someone help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
eric123 said:

Homework Statement


find the following limit: ln((2x)^(2x))/(3x²+1) with x>infinity.


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the following: lim ( ln((2x)^(2x))/(3x²+1) ) with x>infity =
lim ( (3x²+1)/ln((2x)^(2x)) ) with x>0
The step above isn't valid. There is no theorem that says that
\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{a}{b}~=~\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{b}{a}
which is what it seems you have done. IOW, you can't just flip the numerator and denominator and change the limit variable.

As x gets large without bound, both numerator and denominator also get large without bound. The simplest way to do this, I believe, would be to use L'Hopital's Rule.
eric123 said:
lim 2xln(2x) with x>0 = 0, therefore lim ( (3x²+1)/(2xln(2x)) with x>0 =
1/0 which is infinity, a simple plot however shows this is wrong, could someone help me?
 
okay, thank you.
I am, however, not allowed to use L´Hopital´s rule..
does anyone know a method besides L´Hopital´s rule?
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi eric123! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Hint: How fast does ln(x) go up, compared with x? :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top