Finding the magnitude of the nearest peak and period

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem related to a harmonic wave described by the equation h(x,t)=cos(2π(2x-t/2)). The first part of the question seeks the wavelength, while the second part asks for the period of the wave. Participants clarify that the wavelength and period can be derived from the simplified equation cos(4π(X-t/4)). Key insights include the importance of understanding the wave's movement and how to extract values from the general wave equation. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between the wave's parameters and the need for careful analysis to distinguish between them.
apbuiii
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Harmonic wave is described by: h(x,t)=cos(2∏(2x-t/2)). The equation is expressed as the height of the wave

At time t0 a peak of the wave is at position X0. What is the magnitude of the distance to the nearest peak at this time? How much time passes before another peak is observed at that postion?


Homework Equations


Period=2∏/B; Acos(B(X-D))


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that the first part of the question is asking the wavelength and the second part of the question is finding the period. I simplified the equaiton to cos(4∏(X-t/4)). I don't really know how to distinguish the wavelength from the period from the given equation. They both make sense to equal 1/2.

Thanks for your help in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured that the first part of the question is asking the wavelength and the second part of the question is finding the period.
That would be correct :)

Consider the general case: some pulse has a height function f(x) at t=0 - we write: h(x,0)=f(x) ... no brainer really. But if it moves to the right at speed v, then at time t it has moved a distance vt and we have to write:
h(x,t)=f(x-vt)

This is key to what you want to know!

Imagine f(x)=Acos(kx) ...this is your traveling wave at t=0, so at t>0 ... you can take it from here :)
 
Ah, I see what you're saying and I am taking what you left there for me :) Haha. I guess the introduction of two variables at a time confused me haha. One thing at a time... Thank you!
 
Good - since you took the trouble to simplify your equation, once you have expanded the general equation for h(x,t) you can just read-off k and v and use them to get the values you need.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top