Finding the mass of a planet is a binary system

AI Thread Summary
In a binary star system like Plaskett's, both stars revolve around a common center of mass, which implies equal mass for each star. The orbital speed of each star is 220 km/s with an orbital period of 14.4 days. The initial calculation using Kepler's third law resulted in a mass of 2.54 x 10^32, but the correct mass for each star is 1.26 x 10^32, indicating a need to divide by two due to the equal masses. The discussion highlights that Kepler's third law is not directly applicable in this context, as it was originally formulated for a single massive body like the sun. The problem was ultimately solved using centripetal force equating to gravitational pull, suggesting a more appropriate approach for binary systems.
Zynoakib
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Plaskett’s binary system consists of two stars that revolve
in a circular orbit about a center of mass midway between
them. This statement implies that the masses of the two
stars are equal. Assume the orbital speed
of each star is 220 km/s and the orbital period
of each is 14.4 days. Find the mass M of each star.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Kelper's 3rd Law

Mass of the planet = (4(pi)^2(r)^3)/GT^2

T = 1244160
r = 8.72 x 10^10
G = 6.672 x 10^-11

Mass = 2.54 x 10^32, but the answer is 1.26 x 10^32 which is exactly half of my answer

why should I further divide my answer by 2? Is it because there are two planets in the system? But if I use the same equation to calculate the Sun's mass, I just need to substitute all those unknown into the equation without the need to consider the mass of the Earth. So what's wrong?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kepler's third law was originally in the context of planets orbiting the sun. In that context, the sun is so massive compared with the planets that the orbital radius is effectively the distance from the sun's centre. That won't be the case with two equal mass stars, so I'm not sure what the appropriate r is here. Also, how did you obtain r?
 
  • Like
Likes Zynoakib
haruspex said:
Kepler's third law was originally in the context of planets orbiting the sun. In that context, the sun is so massive compared with the planets that the orbital radius is effectively the distance from the sun's centre. That won't be the case with two equal mass stars, so I'm not sure what the appropriate r is here. Also, how did you obtain r?

orbital speed of each star = 220 km/s
orbital period of each = 14.4 days.
Distance Traveled in one period = (220000)(14.4 x 24 x 60 x 60)m. Then, you can get the radius from 2(pi)r

I have solved the problem by using centripetal force= gravitational pull. So probably using Kepler's third law is wrong for binary system.

Thanks anyway
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top