Finding the Mass of an Aluminum Cup Based on Heat Transfer in a System

  • Thread starter Thread starter jincy34
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of an aluminum cup based on heat transfer, the total heat exchange in the system must equal zero. The calculations must consider the heat required to warm the ice from -15°C to 0°C, the heat of fusion to melt the ice, and the heat needed to raise the temperature of the resulting water to 24°C. Initial attempts to solve for the mass of the cup without these considerations resulted in incorrect values. The correct approach involves incorporating all phases of heat transfer to accurately determine the mass of the aluminum cup. This comprehensive method ensures the calculations align with the principles of thermodynamics.
jincy34
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 105.05 g ice cube at -15°C is placed in an aluminum cup whose initial temperature is 73°C. The system comes to an equilibrium temperature of 24°C. What is the mass of the cup?

Homework Equations


Q=mc (delta T)


The Attempt at a Solution



the sum of total heat in the system is equal to zero.
Qice+Qaluminium cup=0
MiceCice(delta T)+MaluminiumCaluminium(delta T)=0
I solved for mass of aluminium cup, and got 0.1951 kg. But, it is wrong.
Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the ice melts, I think you need to take into account the heat of fusion, Q=mL, where m is the mass of the ice and L is the latent heat of fusion.

Try that.
 
I did, and got 0.8633 kg. But, that is wrong too.
 
You need to include terms for:
the heat required to bring the ice from -15 degrees to 0 degrees
the heat of fusion to melt the ice at 0 degrees to water at 0 degrees
the heat required to bring the water at 0 degrees to water at the final temperature of 24 degrees

This will be equal to the heat the aluminum cup loses.
 
Thank you very much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top