Finding the mass of our Galaxy and the number of stars in it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter seizureboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Mass Stars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the mass of the Milky Way Galaxy and the number of stars it contains. The original calculation yielded a mass of approximately 3.44425x10^41 kg and an estimated star count of 1.72213x10^11, which was questioned for accuracy. While the method used was correct, it was noted that the assumption of a uniform spherical mass distribution is flawed, as the galaxy is more disk-shaped. This miscalculation affects the estimated number of stars, which is closer to 172 billion. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the galaxy's structure in mass estimations.
seizureboi
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The sun rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy at a distance of about 30,000 light-years from the center (1 light year=9.5x10^15 meters). If it takes about 200 million years to make one rotation, estimate the mass of our Galaxy. Assume that the mass distribution of our Galaxy is concentrated mostly in a central uniform sphere. If all the stars had about the mass of our sun (2x10^30 kg), how many stars would there be in our Galaxy?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For the mass of the Galaxy I got 3.44425x10^41 and I got a total of 1.72213x10^11 stars. I don't think these answers are correct. HELP!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
172 billion stars looks pretty close. How did you get those answers, and why do you think they're wrong?
 
Turns out I am right. What I did was first convert 200,000,000 years to seconds which gave me 6.3072x10^15 seconds/revolution around the center of the galaxy. Then I plugged the given items into the formula (4pi^2r^3)/(GxT^2), where "r" stands for radius (2.85x10^20), "G" standing for the gravitational constant (6.67x10^-11), and "T" standing for the period (6.3072x10^15). This gave me the mass of the galaxy (3.44425x10^41) and then I took that number and divided it by the mass of the sun since the question says to assume the mass of all other stars to be the same as the sun's, thus giving me the amount of stars in the galaxy (1.72213x10^11).
 
Exactly correct method - however if you count the number of stars in the galaxy it's <10% of this.
We are trying to work out what the rest of the dark mass is.
 
Actually, 172 billion is pretty close to the number of stars in the galaxy. The reason the OP didn't get 10 times this value is because the question assumes the mass of the galaxy is uniformly distributed in a spherical fashion. That's dead wrong: the galaxy is more like a disk than a sphere, and a disk doesn't behave as if all its mass is concentrated at its geometrical center.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is（Figure 2）： F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How many stars in our galaxy if they had the mass of our Sun.
Replies
4
Views
3K
Gravitation problem (estimate numbers of stars in our galaxy)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Homework - Interparticle distance between galaxies
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Explanation for Galaxy Rotation Curves
Replies
12
Views
2K
Astronomy: Speed at the edge of the galaxy
Replies
4
Views
1K
What is the Mass of the Andromeda Galaxy?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Measuring the Distance Between Two Galaxies
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Questions about Supermassive stars in the Milky Way Galaxy
Replies
6
Views
3K
Finding the mass of our Galaxy and the amount of stars in our Galaxy
Replies
1
Views
5K
Newton's Theory of Gravity: Calculating the Orbit of Our Solar System
Replies
4
Views
11K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top