MHB Finding the Matrix Aij: Cubic Root of 2, -4 Power of j & Sqrt of 3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter leprofece
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
leprofece
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Hello friends(a(
Find the matriz A ij) if we know that a) aij = (cubic root (2) )^{i} + {-4}^{j})\{\sqrt{3}} (View attachment 3438
 

Attachments

  • download [1024x768].jpg
    download [1024x768].jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 96
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
leprofece said:
Hello friends(a(
Find the matriz A ij) if we know that a) aij = (cubic root (2) )^{i} + {-4}^{j})\{\sqrt{3}} (View attachment 3438

Hello leprofece, :)

So you are given the general form of the elements of the matrix.

\[a_{ij} = (\sqrt[3]{2})^{i}+\frac{(-4)^{j}}{\sqrt{3}}\]

I cannot read the attachment clearly but I assume that the size of the matrix is \(2\times 3\). That means it has 2 rows and 3 columns. Therefore $i$ runs from 1 to 2 and $j$ runs from 1 to 3. Hence you can find all the elements in the matrix by substituting values for $i$ and $j$.

Example: $a_{12}= (\sqrt[3]{2})^{1}+\frac{(-4)^{2}}{\sqrt{3}}=\sqrt[3]{2}+\frac{16}{\sqrt{3}}\approx 10.498$
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top