Finding the natural frequency of a cylinder oscillating on a circular surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the natural frequency of a cylinder oscillating on a circular surface, highlighting three attempts made by the poster. The first attempt failed to account for the cylinder's rotation, while the second correctly considered both the rotational energy and the cylinder's velocity, although it still had a missing factor in the energy equation. The third attempt struggled with using moment to determine the natural frequency and yielded an incorrect answer similar to the first attempt. Feedback emphasized the importance of including rotational energy and correctly applying the parallel axis theorem. Overall, the poster seeks clarification on their approach and the correctness of their calculations.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is the problem with my 3 attempts:
LVGDf.jpg


1. Alright, so the first attempt, I did not take into account the rotation of the cylinder ωc so I think it is wrong. But it seems to make sense because the whole cylinder rotates about O, so if I find that energy using parallel axis theorem it should get me the correct answer?

2. Here I said the energy from the cylinder is due to the rotational energy of the cylinder itself and also the velocity of the cylinder. I think this one is correct, what do you guys think?

3. I am not sure how to use moment to solve for the natural frequency. For some reason it gave me the same answer as 1. which I think is wrong. Is this one correct?

I know this is a long question, but if anyone could give me some insight on whether or not I did it right, it would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first equation in (1) is missing a factor 1/2 on the θ2, but it appears in the following line. As you say, the energy expression is incomplete, missing the rotational energy. There are several ways to express the total KE. E.g. you can consider the cylinder as rotating about its point of contact with the dish and use the parallel axis theorem. In this view, there is no other KE term.
Writing down the energy equation then differentiating doesn't seem to me to be using the 'energy method'. That transforms it into moment method. You could get the equation into the form θ-dot = etc. then do a trig substitution to integrate.
(2) is the better effort, but it seems to me you have again lost the factor 1/2 on the θ2, and this time it does not reappear.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top