Finding the Normalization Constant for the Hydrogen Radial Wave Function

Patroclus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Find the normalization constant for the radial wave function for Hydrogen.

I'm told that C = 1/(24a^5)^1/2
But how do I get that?


2.
n=2, l=1
R(2)(1)=Cr^(-r/2a。)
the integral from 0 to infinity of (x^4 * e^-"alpha"x) = 24 / alpha^5


3. I honestly don't know where to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends what your starting point is.
If you're going from the Schrödinger equation, you can apply separation of variables:
\psi(r, \theta, \phi) = R(r) Y_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi)
and plug this into the time independent wave equation
\left( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 + V(r) \right) \psi(r, \theta,\phi) = E \psi(r, \theta, \phi)
and derive the equation for R(r).
Then if you solve it and impose appropriate boundary conditions, you will find
R_{nl} (r) = \sqrt {{\left ( \frac{2 Z}{n a_{\mu}} \right ) }^3\frac{(n-l-1)!}{2n[(n+l)!]} } e^{- Z r / {n a_{\mu}}} \left ( \frac{2 Z r}{n a_{\mu}} \right )^{l} L_{n-l-1}^{2l+1} \left ( \frac{2 Z r}{n a_{\mu}} \right )
which you can normalise using the properties of the Laguerre polynomials.

If you were looking for something simpler, please give us more information :-)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top