Finding the potential energy function( I don't know how the answer came to be)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the potential energy function from a conservative force represented as F=A(y,x,0), where A is a constant. The user attempts to derive the potential function by integrating the negative of the force, leading to the expression -2Axy, while the expected answer is -Axy. The confusion arises from the integration path chosen, particularly the evaluation of integrals at specific coordinates, which affects the final result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative forces in physics
  • Knowledge of potential energy functions
  • Proficiency in performing line integrals
  • Familiarity with the concept of gradients in vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of conservative forces and their potential energy functions
  • Study line integrals in the context of vector fields
  • Learn about the gradient operator and its applications in physics
  • Practice solving potential energy problems using different integration paths
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and vector calculus, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to conservative forces and potential energy functions.

Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The give force is conservative [tex]F=A(y,x,0)[/tex] where A is a constant.


The Attempt at a Solution


To find the potential function we integrate the negative of the force. Setting the potential U to be zero at the origin, we can integrate over an easy path, so I think going over to the x direction once, and then up in the y direction could work right?

So here are the two integrals(the z-direction force is zero so it's integral would be zero as well.

[tex]-A\int_0 ^x y' dx' +-A\int_0 ^y x' dy'[/tex]

If I do those integrals I get -2Axy, yet the answer is supposed to be -Axy, I'm wondering if maybe the path I'm using is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Raziel2701! :smile:

The first integral (over x) has to be at y = 0, so it's zero. :wink:

(the second integral (over y) is at x = x)

(btw, isn't it obvious that (y,x,0) = grad(xy) ? :smile:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K