Finding the radius of a satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter Solitary Nut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Satellite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the radius of a satellite's orbit given that two satellites have the same gravitational force acting on them. Satellite A has a mass m and an orbit radius r, while Satellite B has a mass of 6m and an unknown radius rb. The gravitational forces are equated, leading to the equation GMm/r^2 = GM(6m)/rb^2. The error in the initial solution was in the algebraic manipulation, which incorrectly simplified to rb = 6r instead of the correct rb = √6 * r. The clarification provided helps correct the misunderstanding in the calculations.
Solitary Nut
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Just realized how horrible the thread title is. Sorry, I meant the radius of a satellite's *orbit*

Homework Statement



Two satellites revolve around the Earth. Satellite A has mass m and has an orbit of radius r. Satellite B has mass 6m and an orbit of unknown radius rb. The forces of gravitational attraction between each satellite and the Earth is the same. Find rb.
Express your answer in terms of r.

Homework Equations



F=(G(m1m2))/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



F1 = F2, where F1 and F2 are the forces of gravity acting on satellite A and B, respectively.

I equated the formulas for the force of gravity for both satellites because the information given states they are equivalent. I then negated every variable I could - G, m, andmearth, leaving r and rb. It looked like this:

1/r = 6/rb

So I multiplied r and rb into the numerators, getting rb=6r. I don't see what I did wrong here, but clearly it isn't right. Please help set me on the right path, and thanks for at least taking the time to read all of this :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solitary Nut said:

The Attempt at a Solution



F1 = F2, where F1 and F2 are the forces of gravity acting on satellite A and B, respectively.

I equated the formulas for the force of gravity for both satellites because the information given states they are equivalent. I then negated every variable I could - G, m, andmearth, leaving r and rb. It looked like this:

1/r = 6/rb

So I multiplied r and rb into the numerators, getting rb=6r. I don't see what I did wrong here, but clearly it isn't right. Please help set me on the right path, and thanks for at least taking the time to read all of this :)
Check your algebra:

GMm_a/r_a^2 = GMm_b/r_b^2

does not reduce to 1/ra = 6/rb where mb = 6ma

AM
 
Gah, I see. Radical(6)r

Thanks a lot for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top