Finding the Remaining Pressure of a Gas After Removing 2/3rds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Const@ntine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    pressure
AI Thread Summary
To find the remaining pressure of a gas after removing 2/3rds and increasing the temperature, the initial pressure is 11.0 atm at 20.0 C. The process involves using the ideal gas law, where the final moles of gas are one-third of the initial amount. The key equation derived is P_f = P_i * T_f / (3 * T_i), which requires converting temperatures from Celsius to Kelvin. After calculations, the final pressure is determined to be approximately 4.28 atm. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the removal of gas and temperature conversions.
Const@ntine
Messages
285
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement



In a container we have a gas, at P = 11.0 atm & T = 20.0 C. We remove 2/3rds of the gas and increase the temperature to T = 75.0 C.What's the pressure of the gas that remains?

Homework Equations



PV = nRT

The Attempt at a Solution



Normally this would be a regular "put the numbers in the formula" exercise, but I'm having trouble understanding just what "remove 2/3rds of the gas" means. If the gas was, say, a block of wood, I'd be removing 2/3ds of its mass. With that logic, I figured it was the n (moles) that were decreased, and that the volume V was kept the same (same container). But I didn't get the wanted result from this, so I was wrong.

Then I figured maybe the change happens so fast that the gas doesn't manage to spread and have the same Volume again, so both n & V should be n' = n/3 & V' = V/3. That didn't work either. So I'm kinda stuck on what that phrase means.

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're original method is on the right track, but you didn't include your final answer in your post, so I'm going to have to guess that what I did here is different.

Pretty much baked into the definition of the gas is the property that it expands to fill any container, so I wouldn't worry about changing the volume of the gas. Besides what if I took molecules randomly out of the gas instead of scooping out the top 2/3? That's also a viable interpretation of "remove 2/3."

The first thing we need to do is solve for n_iR/V in terms of the initial quantities. Doing so gives P_i/T_i. Now we need to solve for n_iR/V in terms of the final quantities, where n_f=n_i/3: P_fV=n_fRT_f=\frac{n_iRT_f}{3} so n_iR/V=3P_f/T_f Now we equate the two representations of n_iR/V and solve for P_f: \frac{P_i}{T_i}=\frac{3P_f}{T_f} so P_f=P_iT_f/3T_i. At this point, feel free to plug in the numerical quantities and count your sig figs. Right now it looks like if you plugged everything in as is, you'd get a pressure in \text{atm}, so no need to change units unless you really want to.
 
  • Like
Likes Const@ntine
Daniel Gallimore said:
I think you're original method is on the right track, but you didn't include your final answer in your post, so I'm going to have to guess that what I did here is different.

Pretty much baked into the definition of the gas is the property that it expands to fill any container, so I wouldn't worry about changing the volume of the gas. Besides what if I took molecules randomly out of the gas instead of scooping out the top 2/3? That's also a viable interpretation of "remove 2/3."

The first thing we need to do is solve for n_iR/V in terms of the initial quantities. Doing so gives P_i/T_i. Now we need to solve for n_iR/V in terms of the final quantities, where n_f=n_i/3: P_fV=n_fRT_f=\frac{n_iRT_f}{3} so n_iR/V=3P_f/T_f Now we equate the two representations of n_iR/V and solve for P_f: \frac{P_i}{T_i}=\frac{3P_f}{T_f} so P_f=P_iT_f/3T_i. At this point, feel free to plug in the numerical quantities and count your sig figs. Right now it looks like if you plugged everything in as is, you'd get a pressure in \text{atm}, so no need to change units unless you really want to.

That's exactly what I did, but I missed the fact that I had to convert the temperatures from Celcius to Kelvin, so my result didn't match with the book's. That said:

Pi = 11.0 atm
Tf = 75.0 + 273.15 = 348.15 K
Ti = 25.0 + 273.15 = 298.15 K

Pf = Pi*Tf/*Ti = 11.0atm * 348.15 K/3*298.15 K = 4.28 atm

Thanks a ton for the help!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top