Finding the roots of a fourth degree polynomial

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the roots of the fourth degree polynomial x^4 - 6x^2 - 2. Participants explore various methods for solving this polynomial, including substitution and the application of the quadratic formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant suggests substituting y=x^2 to transform the polynomial into a quadratic equation, while others discuss the efficiency of this method and the necessity of square roots in the solution. Questions arise about the existence of simpler or more standard methods for finding the roots.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the method's efficiency and questioning the need for alternative approaches. Some express satisfaction with the current method, while others remain curious about potential simplifications.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the irreducibility of the polynomial by the Eisenstein criterion and the implications of using computational tools like Wolfram for verification. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in checking the correctness of the solutions derived.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Find the roots of x^4 - 6x^2 - 2

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So my first observation is that this polynomial is irreducible by Eisenstein criterion with p=2. If I substitute y=x^2 then this polynomial becomes a quadratic, and I can apply the quadratic equation to get two solutions for y. Then could I take the +/- of the square root of these solutions to get the roots in terms of x? If so, is there a simpler way to find these roots? Thanks PF!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PsychonautQQ said:

Homework Statement


Find the roots of x^4 - 6x^2 - 2

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So my first observation is that this polynomial is irreducible by Eisenstein criterion with p=2. If I substitute y=x^2 then this polynomial becomes a quadratic, and I can apply the quadratic equation to get two solutions for y. Then could I take the +/- of the square root of these solutions to get the roots in terms of x? If so, is there a simpler way to find these roots? Thanks PF!
I find this method pretty fast. The check whether it gives the correct answer has been longer than to write down the solution. And the square roots have to appear somewhere. What do you have in mind?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ and soniys
fresh_42 said:
I find this method pretty fast. The check whether it gives the correct answer has been longer than to write down the solution. And the square roots have to appear somewhere. What do you have in mind?
What do you mean the square roots have to appear somewhere? Yes, the check whether it gives a correct answer seems to be longer, but I could use Wolfram. I don't have any other methods in mind to solve the roots of this polynomial, I was just wondering if there was a more standard/methodical method I could use.
 
PsychonautQQ said:
What do you mean the square roots have to appear somewhere? Yes, the check whether it gives a correct answer seems to be longer, but I could use Wolfram. I don't have any other methods in mind to solve the roots of this polynomial, I was just wondering if there was a more standard/methodical method I could use.
Well, ##y^2 + px +q = 0## let's us directly write ##y_{1,2}=-\frac{p}{2}\pm \sqrt{(\frac{p}{2})^2 - q}## which yields ##x_{1,2,3,4} = \pm (\sqrt{3 \pm \sqrt{11}})##.
I meant ##\sqrt{11}## and ##\sqrt{3\pm \sqrt{11}}## have to be found somehow. So any other method has to output them and I cannot think of any faster method.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ
fresh_42 said:
##\sqrt{3\pm \sqrt{11}}##

Are these not all four roots we were looking for? With +/- at the beginning of course.
 
PsychonautQQ said:
Are these not all four roots we were looking for? With +/- at the beginning of course.
Yes, and that's why I found it rather short and fast.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K