Finding the unitary matrix for a beam splitter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around constructing the unitary matrix for a beam splitter in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The original poster struggles with understanding the input and output states for photons and applying Born's rule, resulting in a non-unitary matrix. Participants clarify that the matrix for the beam splitter can be derived using Fresnel coefficients, emphasizing the importance of the matrix method for expressing linear transformations in this context. They also suggest reviewing an article on interferometry to better grasp the matrix method. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for a solid understanding of quantum mechanics principles to solve these problems effectively.
phb1762
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
(a) Construct the matrix for a beam splitter with a 70% reflectivity.
(b) By applying this operation twice, calculate the output state of a single photon in the input. Hint: the second beam splitter can be oriented in two different ways.
Relevant Equations
1) Born rule for bipartite states ( as there are 2 possibilities for input and two probabilities due to the 70:30 beam splitter)
2) ket space equations
Hello,
I have some trouble understanding how to construct the matrix for the beam splitter (in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer).

I started with deciding my input and output states for the photon.
240971


I then use Borns rule, which I have attached below:
240970

To get the following for the state space of the photon going in:
240974

But in the end, I end up with a matrix that doesn't appear unitary:
240975


I don’t know where I’m going wrong. We’ve only just started doing Quantum and the lectures are quite difficult for me to understand. I would appreciate any help and advice as I really would like to be able to do these types of questions as I suspect they will be in my exam!

Thanks everyone in advance and sorry for the many photos!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    67.2 KB · Views: 522
Physics news on Phys.org
Think again about what happens at BS1 when coming in from the top.
 
I really don’t understand where I’m going wrong, I thought that going in from the top should be inverse of the going in from the left?
 
If only BS1 is present, coming in from the top, was is the probability that the outcome is right?
 
Ah, so something like this:
241116
 
phb1762 said:
Ah, so something like this:
Yes. You can check now that ##U_\mathrm{BS}## is unitary.
 
DrClaude said:
Yes. You can check now that ##U_\mathrm{BS}## is unitary.
Thank you so much for your time, that was very helpful!
 
Without looking at it in detail, if it is a dielectric beamsplitter with an anti-reflection (AR) coating on one side, the Fresnel coefficients for the reflectivity will be ##\rho= \pm \sqrt{.70} ## and the transmission (composite) will be ## \tau=\sqrt{.30} ## for both paths. The matrix method is simply a way to express the linear transformation that occurs with the Fresnel coefficients for the electric field amplitudes of the electromagnetic wave for transmitted and reflected components.
I was unaware of the matrix method for beamsplitters (developed by Schwinger) when I wrote this Insights article: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/fabry-perot-michelson-interferometry-fundamental-approach/
If you can follow the article, you will then understand what the matrix method does.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top