Finding time from a velocity vector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating time using relative velocities in a scenario involving a boat's movement. The equation provided, t = 5 km / (40 km/h - 6 km/h), illustrates how to determine travel time by considering the boat's velocity relative to the shore rather than the water. The notation 5.0 km [W20.0S] indicates a distance of 5.0 km at an angle of 20 degrees West of South. Understanding the subtraction of velocities is crucial for accurately solving relative velocity problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relative velocity concepts
  • Familiarity with vector notation and angles
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and motion equations
  • Ability to perform arithmetic operations with units of speed
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of relative velocity in two-dimensional motion
  • Learn how to interpret vector notation in physics problems
  • Explore kinematic equations for solving motion problems
  • Practice problems involving velocities in different mediums, such as water currents
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and vector analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of relative motion.

ericcy
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A jet-ski driver wants to head to an island in the St.Lawrence River that is 5.0km [W20.0S] away. If he is traveling at a speed of 40.0km/h relative to the water and the St.Lawrence is flowing 6.0km/h [E], how long will it take him to reach the island?
Relevant Equations
v=d/t
I've looked it up online and someone did t=40−65=0.15(h)

I was just wondering why they would subtract the velocities. Could something explain this to me please? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably 5.0km [W20.0S] away means 5.0 km away in the direction 20 degrees West of South. Is this correct?

ericcy said:
I've looked it up online and someone did t=40−65=0.15(h)
That's not very helpful, there are no numbers like 40 or 65 in this problem, so I cannot explain what "they" did and why. The idea of subtracting, or more correctly adding the negative of, velocities is what is done to calculate relative velocities. For example, if your velocity relative to still water is 10 km/h East and the water current is 6 km/h West, your velocity relative to the shore is 10 +(-6) = 4 km/ East. It takes you longer to go the same distance between two fixed points on the shore if you are going against the current and shorter with the current. I am not sure if this is a one or two dimensional relative velocity problem. It depends on what 5.0km [W20.0S] means.
 
kuruman said:
For example, if your velocity relative to still water is 10 km/h East and the water current is 6 km/h West, your velocity relative to the shore is 10 +(-6) = 4 km/ East. It takes you longer to go the same distance between two fixed points on the shore if you are going against the current and shorter with the current. I am not sure if this is a one or two dimensional relative velocity problem. It depends on what 5.0km [W20.0S] means.

If we were to solve for time, like in this question, would we always be expected to use the velocity of the boat relative to the shore and not the water?
 
And my apologies, the equation pasted in wrong, they did t=5[distance to island]/(40[velocity relative to water]-6[velocity of water relative to shore]=0.15h)
 
ericcy said:
If we were to solve for time, like in this question, would we always be expected to use the velocity of the boat relative to the shore and not the water?
Yes because the distance is between points fixed on the shore. If a car drives from point A to point B in such a manner as to keep abreast of the boat, their travel times will be the same, no?

You did not explain what 5.0km [W20.0S] means.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
953
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
686
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
830
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K