Finding Times of Particle Intersections with Equated Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter jono90one
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the times when two particles, defined by their position equations, intersect. Initial attempts to solve the equations yield only one solution, t = 0, which raises questions about the existence of multiple intersection points. Participants clarify that while cos(wt) has multiple solutions, the specific context of the problem limits valid solutions to t = pi/2w and t = -pi/2w. The importance of verifying solutions against both components of the equations is emphasized, leading to the conclusion that there are indeed two distinct times of intersection. Overall, the analysis highlights the need for careful consideration of periodic functions in solving such problems.
jono90one
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the times when the two particles meet
r and w are positive constants

Homework Equations



x1(t) = rcos(wt) i + rsin(wt) j
x2(t) = (2/pi) rwt j

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I can get t = 0 quite easily. I can equate :
rcos(wt) = 0 hence wt = pi/2 [1]
rsin(wt) = 2/pi rwt
hence sub in 1
and you get 1=2/pi wt
so basically you get wt = pi/2 again.
So this route is useless (?)

Alternatively, considering x2 forms a right angle with x1 you can do scalar product and you end up with:
r^2 sin(wt) wt = 0
r, w = + ve

So tsinwt = 0
t = 0, sinwt = 0
t = 0 or wt = 0, pi (or multiple) => t=0

But I am still only getting one t, is there only one t? As the question states time"s".

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cos x is periodic so there are infinitely many points where cos x =0. Your first attempt was correct, you just didn't find all of the points.
 
So in simple terms the answer is t = 0 and t = anything?
(Seems like an odd question?)
 
jono90one said:
So in simple terms the answer is t = 0 and t = anything?
(Seems like an odd question?)

No, t = 0 is not even a solution to cos(wt) = 0. Sketch cos(u) vs u and see if you can write down some values of u where cos u =0. See if you can find a pattern to let you write down all values of u in a formula.
 
Oh ok, then we're just looking at the x-axis intercepts, which is -3pi/2,-pi/2, pi/2, 3pi/2 (For any range).
There are no restrictions given on the question though :\
wt = ...-3pi/2,-pi/2, pi/2, 3pi/2... (I.e. alternates by pi)

But seeming i don't know w (except for that it is positive), t cannot be found?
Usually with these questions you get simultaneous equations, but not here ><
 
You can express t in terms of w at least. You also need verify which of these solutions satisfy the equation for the \hat{j} components.
 
Ohh i see now, so basically
for the j components:
Rsinwt=(2/pi)rwt
r's cancle
sin(wt)=(2/pi) wt
Hence sub in some values for wt, pi/2 and -pi/2 produce pi/2 and -pi/2 respectively. But 3pi/2 or any higher multiple cannot exist as you get
rsinwt = nr where n is greater than one (or less than -1)

Hence we have two solutions:
t=pi/2w
t=-pi/2w

Correct?
 
That's correct. You could sketch sin(wt) and (2/pi) wt to see why they only intersect in two points.
 
Back
Top