Finding total flux on Gaussian surface

AI Thread Summary
To find the total electric flux through a Gaussian surface inside a uniformly charged sphere, the total charge Q within the radius r must be considered, as r is less than R. The electric flux is calculated using Gauss's Law, which states that the flux is equal to the enclosed charge divided by the permittivity of free space (ε₀). Since the Gaussian surface is within the sphere, not all of Q contributes to the flux. The assumption is made that the sphere is a non-conductor, which affects the charge distribution. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly applying Gauss's Law in this scenario.
phymateng
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the uniformly charged sphere with radius R. Q is the total charge inside the sphere. Find the total flux passing through the Gaussian surface (spherical shell) with radius r. (r<R)

Homework Equations



I I tried solving for the Electric Flux by simply dividing the Q by Empselon Knot thought this was too simple to be right, and as I suspected it, it was wrong.

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the formula for the electric flux but using Q divided by Empselon Knot and got it wrong. Maybe I'm not getting the concepts right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi phymateng! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(it's called "espilon nought" … oh, and have an epsilon: ε :wink:)

r < R, so the surface is inside the sphere, so it's not all of Q. :smile:
 
Thank you. Yes, Q is the total charge inside the sphere and they are asking me to find the total flux passing through a gaussian surface of radius r inside the sphere. Radius of sphere is R. (so r<R)
 
this solid sphere is a non conductor i assume..right?
 
it doesn't say. So I assume it isn't.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'

Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'

TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
View full post »
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'

Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'

Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Electric Field Inside a Gaussian Surface with Point Charge q
Replies
4
Views
2K
Flux through a cylindrical surface enclosing part of a sphere
Replies
9
Views
616
Flux Through a Gaussian Surface
Replies
7
Views
3K
Electric Flux through Cubical Surface Enclosing Sphere
Replies
2
Views
4K
E&M: Gauss' Law Surface Charge Density
Replies
4
Views
1K
If closed integral of E.dS is zero over a surface, then...?
Replies
14
Views
932
Electrostatics: Gauss' Law Problem Finding the Flux through a Conducting Spherical Shell
Replies
9
Views
2K
Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K
Electric Field Inside Cylindrical Capacitor
Replies
2
Views
2K
Charge on inner/outer surfaces of two large parallel conducting plates
Replies
11
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top