Finding Total Vector Displacement for a Multi-Directional Trip

AI Thread Summary
To find the total vector displacement for the trip, the motorist's movements are broken down into components using a Cartesian coordinate system. The first leg south results in a displacement of (0, -3600) meters, followed by a westward displacement of (3000, -3600). The final northwest leg contributes approximately (4272.292, -2328) meters. The total displacement vector is obtained by adding these components together. Clarification on whether to find just the total displacement vector or its magnitude is also discussed.
chris_soft_engineer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The problem is:

A motorist drives south at 20.0 m/s for 3.00 min, then turns west and travels at 25.0 m/s for 2.00 min, and finally travels northwest at 30.0 m/s for 1.00 min. For this 6.00-min trip, find (a) the total vector displacement, (b) the average speed, and (c) the average velocity. Let the positive x-axis point east.

I need help figuring out the total vector displacement. I just want someone to explain how you find it and let me work it please.

thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can use a cartisen coordinate system to figure out the vectors

you first travel south for 3600 meters, this would be (0 , -3600)

then you travel west for 3000 meters, add this to the first you have (3000 , -3600)

hen you travel 1800 meters at an angle of 45 degrees so you have ( 4272.292 , -2328)

you can do the rest right
 
That wasn't my question. My question is how do i find the total displacement.
Do i just add all of that together?
 
yes that should do it
 
Thanks so much for the help. :smile: :smile:
 
chris_soft_engineer said:
That wasn't my question. My question is how do i find the total displacement.
Do i just add all of that together?

Adding the components will give you the total displacement vector. Are you sure that is what you want?

Perhaps you were thinking about the magnitude of the vector as well? Do you know how to find this?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top