Finding V and I in a simple circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in a simple circuit to find the voltage (Vo) and current (i). Participants explore the implications of passive sign convention, the consistency of signs in equations, and the interpretation of voltage across circuit elements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation derived from KVL but expresses confusion over the sign of Vo, suggesting it should be -6i instead of 6i.
  • Some participants highlight inconsistencies in the application of signs in the equations.
  • There is a discussion on the passive sign convention and how it affects the assignment of signs in KVL and Ohm's law.
  • Another participant suggests drawing arrows to indicate the direction of positive voltage for each element to clarify the application of KVL.
  • One participant reflects on the relationship between the direction of current and the signs used in KVL and Ohm's law, indicating a deeper consideration of the conventions used.
  • Another participant explains that the voltage difference is negative due to the passive sign convention, emphasizing the importance of understanding potential difference in the context of KVL.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the application of Kirchhoff's law and passive sign convention, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no clear consensus on the correct approach to assigning signs in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of consistency in signs and the potential confusion arising from different interpretations of passive sign convention. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying KVL in circuit analysis without resolving the underlying assumptions or definitions.

Xiao Xiao
Messages
30
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Determine Vo and i in the circuit shown:
Relevant Equations
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law.
So I know I have to use kirchhoff's Voltage Law so when I apply it's:
-12+4i+2Vo-4-Vo=0
and Vo=6i so --> -16+4i+2(6i)-(6i)=0 but apparently that's wrong and Vo should be =-6i and so when I substitute it in the equation it should be
-16+4i+2(-6i)-(-6i)=0 and I don't understand why.
Screenshot_20210602_151851.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have consistency in the + and - signs
 
phinds said:
You don't have consistency in the + and - signs
I thought that when applying the law, and I start in the direction of clockwise loop in my example, the current enters the nagetive terminal for the 12V and I started with -, so now any source with current entering the negative terminal, the current will be given a negative sign, and sources with current entering from the positive terminal will be given a positive sign. Am I correct so far? And from what I understood from what understood from my lecture that the application of passive sign convention in Ohm's law in the equation (am I wrong?). I don't get why we put Vo=-6i and not V=6i, are we applying passive sign convention again? I'm sorry it sounds like a stupid question but my lectures aren't clear on it, like the professor wrote Vo=6i but continued with the answer on the slides which was different. And I don't know why type om Google search bar to find an answer.
 
What I would suggest is that you take each element individually and draw an arrow in the direction for which the voltage of that element is positive. Thus the arrow on the 4 ohms, for example, would be left to right with the arrowhead designating positive. When you have done this for each element then just choose a direction around the loop and add or subtract every element based on the arrow.

Having done that, if you still get the wrong answer, then post your diagram with the arrows and we can see where you went wrong.
 
Last edited:
phinds said:
What I would suggest is that you take each element individually and draw an arrow in the direction for which the voltage of that element is positive. Thus the arrow on the 4 ohms, for example, would be left to right with the arrowhead designating positive. When you have done this for each element then just choose a direction around the loop and add or subtract every element based on the arrow.

Having done that, if you still get the wrong answer, then post your diagram with the arrows and we can see where you went wrong.
Okay, so I took a long time thinking about it. So, in the original Kirchhoff's equation, we assigned a negative because of the passive sign convention and direction of the loop, but in Ohm's law when we did V=iR we gave it a negative sign because the original current (not just the direction of the loop) is going through the negative terminal so the sign is for the current? So if the current went through the positive terminal I'm Ohm's law it would have been positive but we'd still put a negative in kirchhoff's law because of the direction of the loop?
 
Xiao Xiao said:
Okay, so I took a long time thinking about it. So, in the original Kirchhoff's equation, we assigned a negative because of the passive sign convention and direction of the loop, but in Ohm's law when we did V=iR we gave it a negative sign because the original current (not just the direction of the loop) is going through the negative terminal so the sign is for the current? So if the current went through the positive terminal I'm Ohm's law it would have been positive but we'd still put a negative in kirchhoff's law because of the direction of the loop?
FORGET (*) direction of individual elements based on Kirchoff. Just take each element individually based on the stated value, or Ohms Law if appropriate, and draw the appropriate arrow. Then it doesn't MATTER which direction you take for the loop, you still get the right answer.

* An over-statement since once you decide on a direction for the loop then you DO have to use the same direction for each element (and that basically IS the Kirchoff loop)
 
phinds said:
FORGET (*) direction of individual elements based on Kirchoff. Just take each element individually based on the stated value, or Ohms Law if appropriate, and draw the appropriate arrow. Then it doesn't MATTER which direction you take for the loop, you still get the right answer.

* An over-statement since once you decide on a direction for the loop then you DO have to use the same direction for each element (and that basically IS the Kirchoff loop)
Yes, I get it now, thank you.
 
The + and - on Vo mean that you are to subtract the voltage on the negative end from the voltage from the positive end. It is that potential difference that the voltage dependent voltage source is tied to. Since with the given current direction there is a actually a voltage DROP from the minus end to the plus end (passive sign convention) that voltage difference is negative. Thus that voltage is - 6*i.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Xiao Xiao
boo said:
The + and - on Vo mean that you are to subtract the voltage on the negative end from the voltage from the positive end. It is that potential difference that the voltage dependent voltage source is tied to. Since with the given current direction there is a actually a voltage DROP from the minus end to the plus end (passive sign convention) that voltage difference is negative. Thus that voltage is - 6*i.
I see, thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
26K
Replies
15
Views
2K