Engineering Finding V and I in a simple circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to a simple circuit, specifically addressing the correct signs for voltage and current in the equations. Participants clarify the use of passive sign convention, emphasizing that the sign of voltage depends on the direction of current flow through circuit elements. Confusion arises over the assignment of Vo, with explanations highlighting that Vo should be negative when the current enters the negative terminal, leading to Vo = -6i. The importance of drawing arrows to indicate voltage polarity for each element is stressed, ensuring consistency in applying KVL regardless of loop direction. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between current direction and voltage signs is crucial for accurate circuit analysis.
Xiao Xiao
Messages
30
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Determine Vo and i in the circuit shown:
Relevant Equations
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law.
So I know I have to use kirchhoff's Voltage Law so when I apply it's:
-12+4i+2Vo-4-Vo=0
and Vo=6i so --> -16+4i+2(6i)-(6i)=0 but apparently that's wrong and Vo should be =-6i and so when I substitute it in the equation it should be
-16+4i+2(-6i)-(-6i)=0 and I don't understand why.
Screenshot_20210602_151851.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have consistency in the + and - signs
 
phinds said:
You don't have consistency in the + and - signs
I thought that when applying the law, and I start in the direction of clockwise loop in my example, the current enters the nagetive terminal for the 12V and I started with -, so now any source with current entering the negative terminal, the current will be given a negative sign, and sources with current entering from the positive terminal will be given a positive sign. Am I correct so far? And from what I understood from what understood from my lecture that the application of passive sign convention in Ohm's law in the equation (am I wrong?). I don't get why we put Vo=-6i and not V=6i, are we applying passive sign convention again? I'm sorry it sounds like a stupid question but my lectures aren't clear on it, like the professor wrote Vo=6i but continued with the answer on the slides which was different. And I don't know why type om Google search bar to find an answer.
 
What I would suggest is that you take each element individually and draw an arrow in the direction for which the voltage of that element is positive. Thus the arrow on the 4 ohms, for example, would be left to right with the arrowhead designating positive. When you have done this for each element then just choose a direction around the loop and add or subtract every element based on the arrow.

Having done that, if you still get the wrong answer, then post your diagram with the arrows and we can see where you went wrong.
 
Last edited:
phinds said:
What I would suggest is that you take each element individually and draw an arrow in the direction for which the voltage of that element is positive. Thus the arrow on the 4 ohms, for example, would be left to right with the arrowhead designating positive. When you have done this for each element then just choose a direction around the loop and add or subtract every element based on the arrow.

Having done that, if you still get the wrong answer, then post your diagram with the arrows and we can see where you went wrong.
Okay, so I took a long time thinking about it. So, in the original Kirchhoff's equation, we assigned a negative because of the passive sign convention and direction of the loop, but in Ohm's law when we did V=iR we gave it a negative sign because the original current (not just the direction of the loop) is going through the negative terminal so the sign is for the current? So if the current went through the positive terminal I'm Ohm's law it would have been positive but we'd still put a negative in kirchhoff's law because of the direction of the loop?
 
Xiao Xiao said:
Okay, so I took a long time thinking about it. So, in the original Kirchhoff's equation, we assigned a negative because of the passive sign convention and direction of the loop, but in Ohm's law when we did V=iR we gave it a negative sign because the original current (not just the direction of the loop) is going through the negative terminal so the sign is for the current? So if the current went through the positive terminal I'm Ohm's law it would have been positive but we'd still put a negative in kirchhoff's law because of the direction of the loop?
FORGET (*) direction of individual elements based on Kirchoff. Just take each element individually based on the stated value, or Ohms Law if appropriate, and draw the appropriate arrow. Then it doesn't MATTER which direction you take for the loop, you still get the right answer.

* An over-statement since once you decide on a direction for the loop then you DO have to use the same direction for each element (and that basically IS the Kirchoff loop)
 
phinds said:
FORGET (*) direction of individual elements based on Kirchoff. Just take each element individually based on the stated value, or Ohms Law if appropriate, and draw the appropriate arrow. Then it doesn't MATTER which direction you take for the loop, you still get the right answer.

* An over-statement since once you decide on a direction for the loop then you DO have to use the same direction for each element (and that basically IS the Kirchoff loop)
Yes, I get it now, thank you.
 
The + and - on Vo mean that you are to subtract the voltage on the negative end from the voltage from the positive end. It is that potential difference that the voltage dependent voltage source is tied to. Since with the given current direction there is a actually a voltage DROP from the minus end to the plus end (passive sign convention) that voltage difference is negative. Thus that voltage is - 6*i.
 
  • Like
Likes Xiao Xiao
boo said:
The + and - on Vo mean that you are to subtract the voltage on the negative end from the voltage from the positive end. It is that potential difference that the voltage dependent voltage source is tied to. Since with the given current direction there is a actually a voltage DROP from the minus end to the plus end (passive sign convention) that voltage difference is negative. Thus that voltage is - 6*i.
I see, thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
26K
Back
Top