Finding velocity, hinged rhombus

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a hinged rhombus and the calculation of velocities based on the distances between points on the rhombus as it is manipulated. The participants explore the relationships between these distances and their ratios as the configuration changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the ratios of distances between points on the rhombus and how these ratios relate to their velocities. There are inquiries about how to determine specific distances and the implications of these ratios on the problem at hand.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and suggestions for visualizing the problem through drawings. Some participants express confusion about the initial conditions and the relationships between the distances, while others attempt to clarify these concepts through examples and ratios.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific lengths and ratios, but the exact values are not determined. Participants are also considering the implications of constant velocity versus constant acceleration in their reasoning.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


303d0lh.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have the slightest idea on how should i go on making equations, any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using the fact that the horizontal distance between the points OA1, A1A2, A2A3 remain in the same ratio, and hence their velocities.
 
Infinitum said:
Try using the fact that the horizontal distance between the points OA1, A1A2, A2A3 remain in the same ratio, and hence their velocities.

How would i go on finding OA1, A1A2 and A2A3?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
How would i go on finding OA1, A1A2 and A2A3?

You can't find their exact values, but you sure can find their ratios. Let the first rhombus have length 5l, second 2l, and third 2l. Now, when the outermost hinge is pulled, all their angles will change by the same amount. So you have the distance ratio as...?

Hint : A tiny bit of trigonometry will help :smile:
 
Hey Pranav! :smile:

Pranav-Arora said:
How would i go on finding OA1, A1A2 and A2A3?

You're good in drawings aren't you?

What if you make a drawing with the construction fully folded, meaning A1=A2=A3.
And another one with the construction fully extended.

Suppose we measure starting from the wall.

What are the distances to the wall of each point in both cases?
 
Infinitum said:
You can't find their exact values, but you sure can find their ratios. Let the first rhombus have length 5l, second 2l, and third 2l. Now, when the outermost hinge is pulled, all their angles will change by the same amount. So you have the distance ratio as...?

Hint : A tiny bit of trigonometry will help :smile:

Seems like i am doing something wrong, i am getting the distance ratio as 5:3:2. :rolleyes:

Hey ILS! :smile:
I like Serena said:
You're good in drawings aren't you?

What if you make a drawing with the construction fully folded, meaning A1=A2=A3.
And another one with the construction fully extended.

Suppose we measure starting from the wall.

What are the distances to the wall of each point in both cases?

For the second case, the distances will be 10, 6 and 4. I am not able to understand the first case. :confused:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
For the second case, the distances will be 10, 6 and 4. I am not able to understand the first case. :confused:

Those are the distances between the points.
But you need the distances to the wall...?
 
I like Serena said:
Those are the distances between the points.
But you need the distances to the wall...?

Oops, sorry, they are 10, 16 and 20.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Seems like i am doing something wrong, i am getting the distance ratio as 5:3:2. :rolleyes:

Uh yes, I meant the distance ratios from the origin will remain constant. :devil:

So it should be, 5:8:10.Edit : And that agrees with your post above :smile: Now you should be able to find the velocity.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Infinitum said:
Uh yes, I meant the distance ratios from the origin will remain constant. :devil:

:-p
So now what about the velocity? I think i have reached the answer, its d) but i still don't get it why the distance ratio remains constant, how did you come to know that we need to solve it using distance ratio?
 
  • #11
Pranav-Arora said:
Oops, sorry, they are 10, 16 and 20.

Much better! :)

So suppose we fold the construction completely.
The distances to the wall will then be 0, 0, and 0.

Let's call this t=0.
Now we extend it such that A3 has constant velocity V.
The means that at some time t the distance of A3 is Vt=20.

What was the distance to the wall of A2 at that time?
 
  • #12
Pranav-Arora said:
:-p
So now what about the velocity? I think i have reached the answer, its d) but i still don't get it why the distance ratio remains constant, how did you come to know that we need to solve it using distance ratio?

So let's pick the situation where the points are exactly halfway.
This means the rods make an angle of 45 degrees with the horizontal.

What are the respective distances to the wall in this case?
 
  • #13
Pranav-Arora said:
:-p
So now what about the velocity? I think i have reached the answer, its d) but i still don't get it why the distance ratio remains constant, how did you come to know that we need to solve it using distance ratio?

[tex]x_1 : x_2 : x_3[/tex]

is constant, so,

[tex]\frac{dx_1}{dt} : \frac{dx_2}{dt} : \frac{dx_3}{dt}[/tex]

and,

[tex]v = dx/dt[/tex]

:wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I like Serena said:
Much better! :)

So suppose we fold the construction completely.
The distances to the wall will then be 0, 0, and 0.

Let's call this t=0.
Now we extend it such that A3 has constant velocity V.
The means that at some time t the distance of A3 is Vt=20.

What was the distance to the wall of A2 at that time?

The distance of A2 is 16 from the wall at time t=20/V. Assuming the velocity of A2 as v2 and using the equation v2t=16, substituting the value of t, i get v2=0.8V.

I get it now, thanks ILS! :smile:

Any answer to why the distance ratio worked here? If there was a constant acceleration would the distance ratio work?

EDIT: Infinitum answered both of the question with one equation. Thanks Infinitum. :-p
 
  • #15
Good! :wink:
 
  • #16
I like Serena said:
Good! :wink:

You both posted at the same time while i was replying to post #11. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
959