Finding Velocity of a System with Work and Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a system of two masses, where one mass (m2) is falling and the other mass (m1) is on a surface with friction. The goal is to determine the speed of m2 after it has fallen a specific distance, considering the effects of work done by tension and friction. The context includes concepts from work and energy, as well as forces acting on the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of work-energy principles and the role of tension and friction in the system. There are attempts to calculate work done by various forces and to relate potential energy changes to kinetic energy. Questions arise about the assumptions made regarding the forces acting on the masses and the implications of treating the system as non-isolated.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the dynamics of the system, particularly regarding the relationship between tension and the weight of m2. There is an ongoing exploration of how to accurately account for forces and energy transformations in the context of the problem. Multiple interpretations of the energy approach are being considered, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the calculations of friction and the forces involved, suggesting that the wrong mass may have been used in some calculations. There is also a recognition that the system's non-isolated nature complicates the analysis.

xTheLuckySe7en
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The coefficient of friction between the block of mass m1 = 3.00 kg and the surface shown is µk = 0.400. The system starts from rest. What is the speed of the ball of mass m2 = 5.00 kg when it has fallen a distance h = 1.50 m?
pulley_prob_3.png


Note that this is just a generic picture of how the problem is set up. M would be m1 and m would be m2 (the ball).

2. Homework Equations

W = F ⋅ Δr = F * r * cosΘ
Fk = µk * Fn, where Fk is the force due to kinetic friction and Fn is the normal force.
∑W = ΔK, where W is work and K is kinetic energy
Ki + Ui + W - Fkd = Kf + Uf, where K is kinetic energy, U is potential energy and Fkd is the work done by friction (non-isolated system)
K = (1/2)mv^2
U = mgh (or mgΔy)

The Attempt at a Solution


So, I would like to mention that I do have access to the solution to the problem, and I believe I understand the general idea of how it works (treat both masses as a system, and then use the non-isolated system equation listed above with work set equal to zero and so on). Although, before looking at the solution I tried it myself (which turned out to be incorrect).
So, I started by stating that ∑W = Wt + Wk (Wt = work done by tension force and Wk = work done by friction), since the normal force and gravity are not doing any work here (m1 isn't moving vertically, so Δr = 0 in the y-direction).
I got Wt = (5.00kg)(9.80m/s^2)(1.50m)cos0 = 73.5J.
I found friction to be Fk = μk * Fn = (.400)(5.00kg)(9.80m/s^2) = 19.6N, since Fn = mg.
I then found Wk = (19.6N)(1.50m)cos180 = -19.6N
I found ΣW = Wt + Wk = 73.5J - 19.6J = 44.1J
I then used ΣW = ΔK. I know Ki is 0 since it states the system is initially at rest, so ΔK = Kf.
ΔK = (1/2)m1vf^2
Setting them equal to each other...
vf = √[(2*ΔK)/m1] = √[(2*44.1J)/(3.00kg)] = 5.42m/s

The actual answer is vf = 3.74m/s. Why does my attempt not work out to be the correct answer? I know the velocities of both masses are equal due to the tensile force between them and the frictionless (assumed) pulley. I tried thinking of it a different way to try to tell myself that it wasn't correct. I thought of a parallel force pulling m1 with the same force as m2g (49N), and then calculated the total work done and then relating it to the work-kinetic energy theorem to get my answer and it made sense in my head. I'm not understanding how the fact that it's a non-isolated system should get a different velocity than my answer.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the blocks are accelerating, the tension is not equal to the weight of m2. If the tension was equal to the weight of m2, m2 would be in equilibrium and not accelerating at all.
 
Oh, okay. Thank you for that. I would then assume that we wouldn't really be able to find out the tensile force with Newton's Second Law because you would need something for the acceleration of one of the masses, correct?
 
xTheLuckySe7en said:
I then found Wk = (19.6N)(1.50m)cos180 = -19.6N
Check that equation.

Also, in calculating friction force, it looks like you used the wrong mass.

I generally lean towards solving these problems using free body diagrams, where you end up with 2 simultaneous equations. But if I look at this problem in terms of energy (which probably makes more sense), here is my understanding.

After the blocks have moved 1.5 meters, block 2 (5 kg) has a decreased potential energy, which can be calculated. In addition to that, both blocks have increased kinetic energy based on their final velocity (whatever it turns out to be). In addition to that, not all of the potential energy of block 2 was converted to kinetic energy; some of it was lost in the heat that was generated by the friction between block 1 and the surface. That's really all there is that I can see if you are looking at this as a system. The tension in the rope should not come into play. So if I had to write an equation for the system, I would write:

Epi + Eki + W = Epf + Ekf

Epi - Initial potential energy
Eki - Initial kinetic energy
W - Work added to system (in our problem W would be negative because it was energy leaving the system)
Epf - Final potential energy
Ekf - Final kinetic energy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K