Finding Wavelength: Solving with Frequency and Length

AI Thread Summary
To find the wavelength in the lab experiment, the relationship between the length of the pipe and the wavelength must be established, particularly noting whether the pipe is open at both ends or closed at one end. For a closed pipe, the wavelengths correspond to L = 1/4λ, 3/4λ, and 5/4λ, allowing for the calculation of wavelength using the length of the pipe and the frequency. The frequency provided is 512 Hz, but the period is unknown, which can also be determined. Additional considerations include the speed of sound in the tube compared to free air and the potential impact of end correction. Understanding these factors is essential for accurately determining the wavelength in the experiment.
matt1687
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i'm doing a lab and i have a chart which requires me to find the wavelength. The chart looks like this:

Frequency(f) Period (T) Length (l) Wavelength (lambda)
512 ? .15 ?

Homework Equations


the equation is basically what I am looking for



The Attempt at a Solution


I think that L1=1/4 (lambda), and every time you go up a length is goes up (3/4, 5/4 etc.) Is this correct? Because then i could just sub in the length and solve for lambda.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry my chart didnt turn out the way i wanted, its supposed to say frequency = 512, period is unknown, length is .15, and wavelength is unknown
 
It depends on whether or not the pipe is open at both ends or just open at one end. (The one where you hold the tuning fork - or whatever you use to set the air in motion)
If the wavelengths for subsequent harmonics (higher frequencies) are given as lambda= 1/4, 3/4, 5/4 etc times L, then this is true for a pipe that is closed at one end.
So yes. In that case, the wavelength can be found from the length of the pipe and the frequency of its vibration.
I assume you are using different driving frequencies to find different resonances in the same pipe. It's not 100% clear what you are doing, so I'm guessing a little.
There are a couple of other experimental considerations which may or may not be relevant to your investigation, depending on the level you are at. If your teacher has not mentioned them, it probably won't matter. It's worth checking, though.
a) is the speed of sound in the tube, the same as that in free air?
b) there is something called an "end correction" which may be important.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top